The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.04 - July (1995 vol.15)
pp: 40-46
In the process of archaeological excavation, a vast amount of data, much of it three-dimensional in nature, is recorded. In recent years, computer graphics techniques have been applied to the task of visualizing such data. In particular, data visualization has been used to accomplish the virtual reconstruction of site architecture and to enable the display of spatial data distributions using three-dimensional models of site terrain. In the case we present here, these two approaches are integrated in the modeling of a prehistoric pithouse. In order to better visualize artifact distributions in the context of site architecture, surface data is displayed as a layer in a virtual reconstruction viewable at interactive rates. This integration of data display with the architectural model has proven valuable in identifying correlations between distributions of different artifact categories and their spatial proximity to significant architectural features.
archaeological visualization, virtual reconstruction, spatial data display, computer graphics
Philip Peterson, F. David Fracchia, Brian Hayden, "Integrating Spatial Data Display with Virtual Reconstruction", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.15, no. 4, pp. 40-46, July 1995, doi:10.1109/38.391489
1. P. Reilly, "Data Visualization in Archaeology," IBM Systems J., vol. 28, no. 4, 1989, pp. 569-570.
2. K. Delooze and J. Wood, “Furness Abbey Survey Project: The Application of Computer Graphics and Data Visualization to Reconstruction Modeling of an Historic Monument,” in Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1990, K. Lockyear and S. Rahtz, eds., British Archaeological Reports (BAR) International Series, Oxford, 1990, pp. 141-148.
3. B. Collins, “From Ruins to Reality: The Dresden Frauenkirche,” IEEE CG&A, Vol. 13., No. 6, Nov. 1993, pp. 13-15.
4. P. Palamidese, M. Betro, and G. Muccioli, “The Virtual Restoration of the Visir Tomb,” Proc. Visualization 93, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1993, pp. 420-423.
5. W.A. Boismier and P. Reilly, “Expanding the Role of Computer Graphics in the Analysis of Survey Data,” in Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1987, C.L.N. Ruggles and S.P.Q. Rahtz, eds., BAR International Series 393, Oxford, 1988, pp. 221-225.
6. K.L. Kvamme, “Geographic Information Systems and Archaeology,” in Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991, G. Lock and J. Moffett, eds., BAR International Series S577, Oxford, 1991, pp. 77-84.
7. G. Lock and T. Harris, “Visualizing Spatial Data: The Importance of Geographic Information Systems,” in Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective, P. Reilly and S. Rahtz, eds., Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 81-96.
8. S.M. Ervin, “Visualizingn-dimensional Implications of Two-Dimensional Design Decisions,” Proc. Visualization 92, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1992, pp. 356-360.
9. M. Kokonya, “Data Exploration in Archaeology: New Possibilities and Challenges,” in Communication in Archaeology: A Global View of the Impact of Information Technology, Vol. I: Data Visualization, P. Reilly and S. Rahtz, eds., Reilly&Rahtz, Winchester, England, 1990, pp. 49-64.
10. J.G. Spafford, Artifact Distributions on Housepit Floors and Social Organization in Housepits at Keatley Creek, master’s thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., Dept. of Archaeology, 1991.
37 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool