The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Big Island, Hawaii
Jan. 3, 2005 to Jan. 6, 2005
ISBN: 0-7695-2268-8
pp: 19a
Judee K. Burgoon , University of Arizona
J. P. Blair , The University of Texas at San Antonio
Renee E. Strom , Michigan State University
ABSTRACT
In potentially deceptive situations, people rely on heuristic cues to help process information. These heuristic cues can often lead to biases concerning how the receiver views the information provided by the sender. One such bias is a truth bias, which has been documented to occur in many potentially deceptive situations (Levine, Parks & McCornack, 1999). It was hypothesized in this study that receivers would make more truthful than deceptive judgments. This study also sought to explore the impact the modality might have on truth bias. It was hypothesized that the truth bias would be strongest in the visual condition, intermediate in the audio condition, and lowest in the text condition. Finally, whether using computer-mediated forms of communication could improve deception accuracy was addressed. It was hypothesized that deception detection would be most accurate in the audio condition. Results supported the first two hypotheses but not the third.
INDEX TERMS
null
CITATION
Judee K. Burgoon, J. P. Blair, Renee E. Strom, "Heuristics and Modalities in Determining Truth Versus Deception", HICSS, 2005, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2005, pp. 19a, doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.294
5 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool