| | This Article | |
| |
| |
| | Share | |
| |
| |
| | Bibliographic References | |
| |
| |
| | Add to: | |
| |
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
| |
| | Search | |
| |
| |
| | |
Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization
November/December 2008 (vol. 14 no. 6)
pp. 1173-1180
Even though information visualization (InfoVis) research has matured in recent years, it is generally acknowledged that the field still lacks supporting, encompassing theories. In this paper, we argue that the distributed cognition framework can be used to substantiate the theoretical foundation of InfoVis. We highlight fundamental assumptions and theoretical constructs of the distributed cognition approach, based on the cognitive science literature and a real life scenario. We then discuss how the distributed cognition framework can have an impact on the research directions and methodologies we take as InfoVis researchers. Our contributions are as follows. First, we highlight the view that cognition is more an emergent property of interaction than a property of the human mind. Second, we argue that a reductionist approach to study the abstract properties of isolated human minds may not be useful in informing InfoVis design. Finally we propose to make cognition an explicit research agenda, and discuss the implications on how we perform evaluation and theory building.
[1] B. Anderson, Work, ethnography and system design. In A. Kent and J. G. Williams, editors, The Encyclopedia of Microcomputers, volume 20, pages 159–183. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997.
[2] S. Barab and K. Squire, Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Design-Based Research: Clarifying the Terms, 13 (1): 1–14, 2004.
[3] J. Bardram, Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, 1998. ACM.
[4] B. B. Bederson and B. Shneiderman, Theories for understanding information visualization. In The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections, chapter 8, pages 349–351. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
[5] J. Bertin, Graphics and Graphic Information Processing. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1981.
[6] S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman, Readings in information visualization: using vision to think, chapter 1, pages 1–34. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 25 January 1999.
[7] E. Chi, A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In Proceedings of InfoVis '00, Salt Lake City, UT, 2000.
[8] M. Cole and P. Griffin, Cultural amplifiers reconsidered. The social foundations of language and thought, pages 343–364, 1980.
[9] B. Craft and P. Cairns, Beyond guidelines: What can we learn from the visual information seeking mantra? In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Visualization (IV'05), pages 110–118. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
[10] P. Dourish, Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 541–550, 2006.
[11] J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, US, 1986.
[12] C. Görg, Z. Liu, N. Parekh, K. Singhal, and J. Stasko, Jigsaw meets Blue Iguanodon - The VAST 2007 Contest. In Proceedings of IEEE VAST '07, pages 235–236, Sacramento, CA, October 2007.
[13] S. Greenberg and B. Buxton, Usability evaluation considered harmful (sometimes). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, 2008.
[14] C. A. Halverson, Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: or What does CSCW need to do with Theories? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11: 243–267, 2002.
[15] S. Hawking, A Brief History of Time. Bantam, 10 anv edition, 1998.
[16] C. Healey, K. Booth, and J. Enns, High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 3 (2): 107–135, 1996.
[17] J. D. Hollan, E. Hutchins, and D. Kirsh, Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (2), 2000.
[18] E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
[19] D. Kirsh, Distributed cognition: A methodological note. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14 (2): 249–262, 2006.
[20] D. Kirsh and P. Maglio, On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18 (4): 513–549, 1994.
[21] G. A. Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63: 81–97, 1956.
[22] N. J. Nersessian, The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organizational Studies, 27 (1): 125–145, 2006.
[23] N. J. Nersessian, Mental modelling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, editor, Handbook of Conceptual Change. Routledge, London, 2008. In Press.
[24] D. Norman, Things that Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, chapter 3. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
[25] C. North, Visualization viewpoints: Toward measuring visualization insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26 (3): 6–9, 2006.
[26] H. C. Purchase, N. Andrienko, T. Jankun-Kelly, and M. Ward, Theoretical foundations of information visualization. In A. Kerren, J. T. Stasko, J.-D. Fekete, and C. North, editors, Information Visualization - Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, chapter 3. Springer, 2008.
[27] B. Shneiderman, The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy of information visualizations. In Proc. IEEE Visual Languages '96, pages 336–343, 1996.
[28] B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant, Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: Multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In BELIV : BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization, Venice, Italy, 2006.
[29] H. A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, 1996.
[30] J. Stasko, C. Görg, Z. Liu, and K. Singhal, Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. In Proceedings of IEEE VAST '07, Sacramento, CA, October 2007.
[31] J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, Illuminating the Path: the Reseach and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2005.
[32] E. R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Second Edition. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 2001.
[33] R. D. Tweney, A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In B. Gholson, W. R. S. Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, and A. C. Houts, editors, Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience, pages 342–366. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.
[34] F. B. Viégas, danah boyd, D. H. Nguyen, J. Potter, and J. Donath, Digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling: Posthistory and social network fragments. In Proc. of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.
[35] F. B. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, F. van Ham, J. Kriss, and M. McKeon, Many eyes: A site for visualization at internet scale. In IEEE Information Visualization '07, pages 1121–1128, Sacramento, CA, October 2007.
[36] D. D. Woods, Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: Ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In J. Flack, P. Hancock, J. Cairn, and K. Vincente, editors, Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems, pages 157–188. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.
[37] J. S. Yi, Y. ah Kang, J. T. Stasko, and J. A. Jacko, Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13 (6): 1224–1231, 2007.
[38] J. S. Yi, Y. ah Kang, J. T. Stasko, and J. A. Jacko, Understanding and characterizing insights: How do people gain insights using information visualization. In Proceedings of BELIV '08, Florence, Italy, April, 2008.
[39] J. Zhang, The Interaction between Perceptual and Cognitive Processes in a Distributed Problem Solving Task. Working Notes of the 1993 AAAI Fall Symposium on Games: Planning and Learning, 1993.
[40] J. Zhang and D. Norman, Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks. Cognitive Science, 18 (1): 87–122, 1994.
Index Terms:
Index Terms—Information visualization, distributed cognition, interaction, representation, theory and methods
Citation:
Zhicheng Liu, Nancy Nersessian, John Stasko, "Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1173-1180, Nov./Dec. 2008, doi:10.1109/TVCG.2008.121