Clarification of Assumptions in the Relationship between the Bayes Decision Rule and the Whitened Cosine Similarity Measure June 2008 (vol. 30 no. 6) pp. 1116-1117
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.66
This paper first clarifies Assumption 3 (which misses a constant) and Assumption 4 (where the whitened pattern vectors refer to the whitened means) in paper "The Bayes Decision Rule Induced Similarity Measures" (IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence), vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1086-1090, 2007), and then provides examples to show that the assumptions after the clarification are consistent. [1] P.N. Belhumeur, J.P. Hespanha, and D.J. Kriegman, “Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 711-720, July 1997.
Index Terms:
Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Computer Vision
Citation:
Chengjun Liu, "Clarification of Assumptions in the Relationship between the Bayes Decision Rule and the Whitened Cosine Similarity Measure," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1116-1117, Mar. 2008, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2008.66 Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||