| | This Article | |
| |
| |
| | Share | |
| |
| |
| | Bibliographic References | |
| |
| |
| | Add to: | |
| |
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
| |
| | Search | |
| |
| |
| | |
Optimized Scalable Video Streaming over IEEE 802.11a/e HCCA Wireless Networks under Delay Constraints
June 2006 (vol. 5 no. 6)
pp. 755-768
The quality-of-service (QoS) guarantees enabled by the new IEEE 802.11a/e Wireless LAN (WLAN) standard are specifically targeting the real-time transmission of multimedia content over the wireless medium. Since video data consume the largest part of the available bitrate compared to other media, optimization of video streaming for this new standard is a significant factor for the successful deployment of practical systems. Delay-constrained streaming of fully-scalable video over IEEE 802.11a/e WLANs is of great interest for many multimedia applications. The new medium access control (MAC) protocol of IEEE 802.11e is called the Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) and, in this paper, we will specifically consider the problem of video transmission over HCF Controlled Channel Access (HCCA). A cross-layer optimization across the MAC and application layers of the OSI stack is used in order to exploit the features provided by the combination of the new HCCA standard with new versatile scalable video coding algorithms. Specifically, we propose an optimized and scalable HCCA-based admission control for delay-constrained video streaming applications that leads to a larger number of stations being simultaneously admitted (without quality reduction to any video flow). Subsequently, given the allocated transmission opportunity, each station deploys an optimized Application-MAC-PHY adaptation, scheduling, and protection strategy that is facilitated by the fine-grain layering provided by the scalable bitstream. Given that each video flow needs to always comply with the predetermined (a priori negotiated) traffic specification parameters, this cross-layer strategy enables graceful quality degradation whenever the channel conditions or the video sequence characteristics change. For instance, it is demonstrated that the proposed cross-layer protection and bitstream adaptation strategies facilitate QoS token rate adaptation under link adaptation mechanisms that utilize different physical layer transmission rates. The expected gains offered by the optimized solutions proposed in this paper are established theoretically, as well as through simulations.
[1] 755 D. Majumdar, G. Sachs, I.V. Kozintsev, and K. Ramchandran, “Multicast and Unicast Real-Time Video Streaming over Wireless LANs,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 524-534, June 2002.[2] Y. Shan and A. Zakhor, “Cross Layer Techniques for Adaptive Video Streaming over Wireless Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Multimedia and Expo, vol. 1, pp. 277-280, Sept. 2002.[3] Q. Li and M. van der Schaar, “Providing Adaptive QoS to Layered Video over Wireless Local Area Networks through Real-Time Retry Limit Adaptation,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 278-290, Apr. 2004.[4] M. van der Schaar, S. Krishnamachari, S. Choi, and X. Xu, ”Adaptive Cross-Layer Protection Strategies for Robust Scalable Video Transmission over 802.11 WLANs,” IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 21, no. 10, Dec. 2003.[5] M. van der Schaar and S. Shankar, “Cross-Layer Wireless Multimedia Transmission: Challenges, Principles and New Paradigms,” IEEE Wireless Comm. Magazine, vol. 12, no. 4, Aug. 2005.[6] IEEE Standard 802.11-1999, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, 1999.[7] IEEE 802.11e/D5.0, Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Medium Access Control (MAC) Enhancements for Quality of Service (QoS), draft supplement, June 2003.[8] A. Grilo, M. Macedo, and M. Nunes, “A Scheduling Algorithm for QoS Support in IEEE 802.11E Networks,” IEEE Wireless Comm. Magazine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 36-43, June 2003.[9] P. Ansel, Q. Ni, and T. Turletti, “An Efficient Scheduling Scheme for IEEE 802.11E,” Proc. IEEE Workshop Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad-Hoc and Wireless Networking, Mar. 2004.[10] S. Mangold, S. Choi, G. Hiertz, O. Klein, and B. Walker, “Analysis of IEEE 802.11E for QoS Support in Wireless LANs,” IEEE Wireless Comm. Magazine, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 40-50, Dec. 2003.[11] T. Wiegand, G. Sullivan, G. Bjontegaard, and A. Luthra, “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 560-576, July 2003.[12] M. Karcewicz and R. Kurceren, “The SP- and SI-Frames Design for H.264/AVC,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 637-644, July 2003.[13] J.-R. Ohm, “Advances in Scalable Video Coding,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, pp. 42-56, 2005.[14] P. Garg, R. Doshi, R. Greene, M. Baker, M. Malek, and X. Cheng, “Using IEEE 802.11E MAC for QoS over Wireless,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Performance Computing and Comm., vol. 1, pp. 537-542, Apr. 2003.[15] B.V. Patel and C.C. Bisdikian, “End-Station Performance over Leaky Bucket Traffic Shaping,” IEEE Network Magazine, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 40-47, Sept. 1996.[16] A.R. Reibman and B. Haskell, “Constraints on Variable Bit-Rate Video over ATM Networks,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 361-372, Dec. 1992.[17] S. Shankar, Z. Hu, and M. van der Schaar, “Cross-Layer Optimized Transmission of Wavelet Video over IEEE 802.11a/e WLANs,” Proc. Packet Video Workshop, Apr. 2004.[18] P.A. Chou and Z. Miao, “Rate-Distortion Optimized Streaming of Packetized Media,” Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-35, Feb. 2001, also submitted to IEEE Trans. Multimedia.[19] H. Schwarz, T. Hinz, H. Kirchhoffer, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand, “Technical Description of the HHI Proposal for SVC CE1,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 (MPEG), m11244, Oct. 2004.[20] D. Taubman, D. Maestroni, R. Mathew, and S. Tubaro, “SVC Core Experiment 1, Description of UNSW Contribution,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 (MPEG), m11441, Oct. 2004.[21] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.[22] D. Qiao, S. Choi, and K.G. Shin, “Goodput Analysis and Link Adaptation for IEEE 802.11a Wireless LAN,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 278-292, Oct. 2002.[23] T. Rusert, K. Hanke, and J.-R. Ohm, “Transition Filtering and Optimized Quantization in Interframe Wavelet Video Coding,” Proc. SPIE Visualization Comm. and Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 682-693, 2003.[24] M. Wang and M. van der Schaar, “Operational Rate-Distortion Modeling for Wavelet Video Coders,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, accepted for publication.[25] Y. Andreopoulos, R. Kelarapura, M. van der Schaar, and C.-N. Chuah, “Failure-Aware, Open-Loop, Adaptive Video Streaming with Packet-Level Optimized Redundancy,” IEEE Trans. Multimedia, submitted.[26] JPEG2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards and Practice, D. Taubman and M. Marcellin, eds. Kluwer Academic, 2002.[27] M. Schwartz, Telecommunication Networks: Protocols, Modeling, and Analysis. Addison Wesley, 2005.[28] D.S. Turaga and M. van der Schaar, “Cross-Layer Aware Packetization Strategies for Optimized Wireless Multimedia Transmission,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing, Oct. 2005.
Index Terms:
IEEE 802.11e WLANs, delay-constrained video streaming, cross-layer optimization, QoS-enabled MAC scheduling, token rate adaptation, link adaptation.
Citation:
Mihaela van der Schaar, Yiannis Andreopoulos, Zhiping Hu, "Optimized Scalable Video Streaming over IEEE 802.11a/e HCCA Wireless Networks under Delay Constraints," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 755-768, June 2006, doi:10.1109/TMC.2006.81