loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
2008 Ninth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing
A Comparative Evaluation of Tests Generated from Different UML Diagrams
August 06-August 08
ISBN: 978-0-7695-3263-9
ASCII Text
x 
 
Supaporn Kansomkeat, Jeff Offutt, Aynur Abdurazik, Andrea Baldini, "A Comparative Evaluation of Tests Generated from Different UML Diagrams," Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, ACIS International Conference on, pp. 867-872, 2008 Ninth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2008.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/SNPD.2008.48,
author = {Supaporn Kansomkeat and Jeff Offutt and Aynur Abdurazik and Andrea Baldini},
title = {A Comparative Evaluation of Tests Generated from Different UML Diagrams},
journal ={Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, ACIS International Conference on},
volume = {0},
year = {2008},
isbn = {978-0-7695-3263-9},
pages = {867-872},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SNPD.2008.48},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - CONF
JO - Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, ACIS International Conference on
TI - A Comparative Evaluation of Tests Generated from Different UML Diagrams
SN - 978-0-7695-3263-9
SP867
EP872
A1 - Supaporn Kansomkeat,
A1 - Jeff Offutt,
A1 - Aynur Abdurazik,
A1 - Andrea Baldini,
PY - 2008
KW - Software Testing
KW - Model-based Testing
KW - UML Diagram
VL - 0
JA - Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, ACIS International Conference on
ER -
 
This paper presents a single project experiment on the fault revealing capabilities of model-based test sets. The tests are generated from UML statecharts and UML sequence diagrams. This experiment found that the statechart test sets did better at revealing unit level faults than the sequence diagram test sets, and the sequence diagram test sets did better at revealing integration level faults than the statechart test sets. The statecharts also resulted in more test cases than the sequence diagrams. The results show that model-based testing can be used to systematically generate test data and indicates that different UML models can play different roles in testing.
Index Terms:
Software Testing, Model-based Testing, UML Diagram
Citation:
Supaporn Kansomkeat, Jeff Offutt, Aynur Abdurazik, Andrea Baldini, "A Comparative Evaluation of Tests Generated from Different UML Diagrams," snpd, pp.867-872, 2008 Ninth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2008
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.