loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
March/April 2010 (vol. 27 no. 2)
pp. 4-7
ASCII Text
x 
 
Hakan Erdogmus, "Regress or Progress? Seeing Good Software Engineering Ideas Through," IEEE Software, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 4-7, March/April, 2010.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/MS.2010.50,
author = {Hakan Erdogmus},
title = {Regress or Progress? Seeing Good Software Engineering Ideas Through},
journal ={IEEE Software},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
issn = {0740-7459},
year = {2010},
pages = {4-7},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2010.50},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - MGZN
JO - IEEE Software
TI - Regress or Progress? Seeing Good Software Engineering Ideas Through
IS - 2
SN - 0740-7459
SP4
EP7
EPD - 4-7
A1 - Hakan Erdogmus,
PY - 2010
KW - software engineering innovation
KW - diffusion of software innovations
KW - adoptability of software innovations
VL - 27
JA - IEEE Software
ER -
 
Hakan Erdogmus, Kalemun Research
The maturation of modern software engineering ideas follows an incremental, threaded, and reversive process with distinct states. Five levers underlie these states: unbiased reflection, neat bundling, effective branding, easy sandboxing, and optimal extraction. The five levers help a worthwhile idea move more quickly toward acceptance and adoption without surrendering to reversion.
Index Terms:
software engineering innovation, diffusion of software innovations, adoptability of software innovations
Citation:
Hakan Erdogmus, "Regress or Progress? Seeing Good Software Engineering Ideas Through," IEEE Software, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 4-7, Mar./Apr. 2010, doi:10.1109/MS.2010.50
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.