Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process?

I
ISQED
2006
7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED'06)
Abstract - Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process?

	This Article
	PDF RSS feed
	Share
	Email this Article to a friend
	Bibliographic References
	ASCII Text BibTex RefWorks Procite/RefMan
	Add to:
	Digg Furl Spurl Blink Simpy Google Del.icio.us Y!MyWeb
	Search
	Similar Articles Articles by Ron Wilson Articles by David Overhauser

7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED'06)

Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process? (PDF)

San Jose, California

March 27-March 29

ISBN: 0-7695-2523-7

	ASCII Text	x
	Ron Wilson, David Overhauser, "Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process?," Quality Electronic Design, International Symposium on, pp. 507, 7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED'06), 2006.

	BibTex	x
	@article{ 10.1109/ISQED.2006.146, author = {Ron Wilson and David Overhauser}, title = {Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process?}, journal ={Quality Electronic Design, International Symposium on}, volume = {0}, year = {2006}, isbn = {0-7695-2523-7}, pages = {507}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISQED.2006.146}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, }

	RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote	x
	TY - CONF JO - Quality Electronic Design, International Symposium on TI - Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process? SN - 0-7695-2523-7 SP EP A1 - Ron Wilson, A1 - David Overhauser, PY - 2006 KW - null VL - 0 JA - Quality Electronic Design, International Symposium on ER -

Ron Wilson, EDN

David Overhauser, David Overhauser

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISQED.2006.146

From development through manufacturing an IP core undergoes many different stages that can affect the overall quality and characteristics of the core. When a project is slowed or halted because of a problem with the IP core then who is responsible? Is it the IP provider who provided a core that worked at delivery, the integrator that made changes as necessary or perhaps the manufacturer? This panel will explore the many possible causes of problems with an IP core, but more importantly it will examine what is being done to minimize the risk associated with third party IP and who is responsible.

Citation:

Ron Wilson, David Overhauser, "Who is really responsible for quality throughout the design process?," isqed, pp.507, 7th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED'06), 2006

Peer Review Notice | Give Us Feedback

Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.