An efficient mechanism to track and enforce memory dependences is crucial to an out-of-order microprocessor. The conventional approach of using cross-checked load queue and store queue, while very effective in earlier processor incarnations, suffers from scalability problems in modern high-frequency designs that rely on buffering many in-flight instructions to exploit instruction-level parallelism. In this paper, we make a case for a very different approach to dynamic memory disambiguation. We move away from the conventional exact disambiguation strategy and adopt an opportunistic method: we allow loads and stores to access an L0 cache as they are issued out of program order, hoping that with such a laissez-faire approach, most loads actually obtain the right value. To guarantee correctness, they execute a second time in program order to access the nonspeculative L1 cache. A discrepancy between the two executions triggers a replay. Such a design completely eliminates the necessity of real-time violation detection and thus avoids the conventional approach?s complexity and the associated scalability issue. We show that even a simplistic design can provide similar performance level achieved with a conventional queue-based approach with optimisticallysized queues. When simple, optional optimizations are applied, the performance level is close to that achieved with ideally-sized queues.