loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
Comparison of shot boundary detectors
Amsterdam, Netherlands
July 06-July 06
ISBN: 0-7803-9331-7
ASCII Text
x 
 
J. Nesvadba, F. Ernst, J. Perhavc, J. Benois-Pineau, L. Primaux, "Comparison of shot boundary detectors," Multimedia and Expo, IEEE International Conference on, pp. 4 pp., 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2005.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/ICME.2005.1521541,
author = {J. Nesvadba and F. Ernst and J. Perhavc and J. Benois-Pineau and L. Primaux},
title = {Comparison of shot boundary detectors},
journal ={Multimedia and Expo, IEEE International Conference on},
volume = {0},
year = {2005},
isbn = {0-7803-9331-7},
pages = {4 pp.},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICME.2005.1521541},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - CONF
JO - Multimedia and Expo, IEEE International Conference on
TI - Comparison of shot boundary detectors
SN - 0-7803-9331-7
SP
EP
A1 - J. Nesvadba,
A1 - F. Ernst,
A1 - J. Perhavc,
A1 - J. Benois-Pineau,
A1 - L. Primaux,
PY - 2005
KW - video-processing technology
KW - shot boundary detector
KW - SBD
KW - video cut detector
KW - field-difference-based CD algorithm
KW - spatio-temporal audiovisual segmentation
KW - culture-diverse multigenre AV corpus
VL - 0
JA - Multimedia and Expo, IEEE International Conference on
ER -
 
J. Nesvadba, Philips Res., Eindhoven, Netherlands
F. Ernst, Philips Res., Eindhoven, Netherlands
J. Perhavc, Philips Res., Eindhoven, Netherlands
A video cut detector (CD), a member of the shot boundary detector (SBD) group, is an essential element for spatio-temporal audiovisual (AV) segmentation and various video-processing technologies. Platform, processing and performance constraints forced the development of various dedicated CDs. Future platforms allow the usage of advanced CD algorithms with higher reliability. In order to enable an appropriate trade-off decision to be made between reliability and the required processing power, benchmarking of four CD algorithms has taken place on bases of a generic, culture-diverse multi-genre AV corpus. In terms of complexity/performance trade-off, a field-difference-based CD proved to be optimal.
Index Terms:
video-processing technology, shot boundary detector, SBD, video cut detector, field-difference-based CD algorithm, spatio-temporal audiovisual segmentation, culture-diverse multigenre AV corpus
Citation:
J. Nesvadba, F. Ernst, J. Perhavc, J. Benois-Pineau, L. Primaux, "Comparison of shot boundary detectors," icme, pp.4 pp., 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.