loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Eighth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'05)
A Comparison of Clustering Methods for Writer Identification and Verification
Seoul, Korea
August 31-September 01
ISBN: 0-7695-2420-6
Marius Bulacu, AI Institute, Groningen University, The Netherlands
Lambert Schomaker, AI Institute, Groningen University, The Netherlands
An effective method for writer identification and veri- fication is based on assuming that each writer acts as a stochastic generator of ink-trace fragments, or graphemes. The probability distribution of these simple shapes in a given handwriting sample is characteristic for the writer and is computed using a common codebook of graphemes obtained by clustering. In previous studies we used contours to encode the graphemes, in the current paper we explore a complementary shape representation using normalized bitmaps. The most important aim of the current work is to compare three different clustering methods for generating the grapheme codebook: k-means, Kohonen SOM 1D and 2D. Large scale computational experiments show that the proposed method is robust to the underlying shape representation used (whether contours or normalized bitmaps), to the size of codebook used (stable performance for sizes from 102 to 2.5?103) and to the clustering method used to generate the codebook (essentially the same performance was obtained for all three clustering methods).
Citation:
Marius Bulacu, Lambert Schomaker, "A Comparison of Clustering Methods for Writer Identification and Verification," icdar, pp.1275-1279, Eighth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'05), 2005
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.