loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)
Big Island, Hawaii
January 03-January 06
ISBN: 0-7695-2755-8
Scott L. Schneberger, Appalachian State University
Hugh J. Watson, University of Georgia, USA
Carol E. Pollard, Appalachian State University
While debates continue about the rigor and relevance of IS research, theories are still widely accepted as the bedrock of scientific research. This paper addresses the issues surrounding academic research rigor and relevance by discussing the rigor and relevance of research theories--in particular, big T and little t theories. Big T theories are usually highly recognized, refined, validated, and generalizable theories usually associated with rigorous research and publication. Little t theories may be relatively immature, little known, narrowly focused, simple, and highly relevant theories more generally appreciated by business practitioners. Little t theories have special characteristics that can be very useful to researchers and teachers, and highly relevant to business practitioners. Moreover, academics can take clear steps to build, publish, teach, and apply little t theories.
Citation:
Scott L. Schneberger, Hugh J. Watson, Carol E. Pollard, "The Efficacy of "Little t" Theories," hicss, pp.250b, 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), 2007
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.