loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07)
Can you beat treewidth?
Providence, Rhode Island
October 21-October 23
ISBN: 0-7695-3010-9
It is well-known that constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) can be solved in time n^{{\rm O}(k)} if the treewidth of the primal graph of the instance is at most k and n is the size of the input. We show that no algorithm can be significantly better than this treewidth-based algorithm, even if we restrict the problem to some special class of primal graphs. Formally, let G be an arbitrary class of graphs and assume that there is an algorithm A solving binary CSP for instances whose primal graph is in G . We prove that if the running time of A is f(G)n^{{\rm O}(k/\log k)}, where k is the treewidth of the primal graph G and f is an arbitrary function, then the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. We prove the result also in the more general framework of the homomorphism problem for bounded-arity relational structures. For this problem, the treewidth of the core of the left-hand side structure plays the same role as the treewidth of the primal graph above.
Citation:
Dániel Marx, "Can you beat treewidth?," focs, pp.169-179, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07), 2007
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.