loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'06)
An Empirically-Based Criterion for Determining the Success of an Open-Source Project
Sydney, Australia
April 18-April 21
ISBN: 0-7695-2551-2
Dror G. Feitelson, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Gillian Z. Heller, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Stephen R. Schach, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
In order to determine a success criterion for open-source software projects, we analyzed 122,205 projects in the SourceForge database. There were 80,597 projects with no downloads at all. We restricted our analysis to the 41,608 projects that together were downloaded 704,897,520 times. Contrary to what we had expected, the distribution of the number of downloads of each project is not Zipf-like; only a portion of the log-log plot of the number of downloads and their rank appears to be a straight line. We performed leastsquares analysis (utilizing the Bayesian information criterion) to divide the plot into three segments. On the basis of the shapes of the corresponding curves and the locations of their boundary points, we categorized the projects as follows: 85 superprojects (highly successful projects with more than 1.1 million downloads); just over 10,000 successful projects (with more than 1680 downloads each); and struggling projects (with 1680 downloads or fewer). In terms of our criterion, only a quarter of the projects that have one or more downloads can be deemed to be successful.
Index Terms:
open-source software; distribution of downloads;Zipf-like distribution; SourceForge repository; success criterion.
Citation:
Dror G. Feitelson, Gillian Z. Heller, Stephen R. Schach, "An Empirically-Based Criterion for Determining the Success of an Open-Source Project," aswec, pp.363-368, Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'06), 2006
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.