loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Australasian Computer Science Conference
Inductive Concept Learning in the Absence of Labeled Counter-Examples
Canberra, Australia
January 31-February 03
ISBN: 0-7695-0518-X
Andrew Skabar, University of Ballarat
Kousick Biswas, University of Ballarat
Binh Pham, University of Ballarat
Anthony Maeder, Queensland University of Technology
Supervised machine learning techniques generally require that the training set on which learning is based contain sufficient examples representative of the target concept, as well as known counter-examples of the concept. However in many application domains it is not possible to supply a set of labeled counter-examples. This paper presents a technique that combines supervised and unsupervised learning to discover symbolic concept descriptions from a training set in which only positive instances appear with class labels. Experimental results obtained from applying the technique to several real world datasets are provided. These results suggest that in some problem domains learning without labeled counter-examples can lead to classification performance comparable to that of conventional learning algorithms, despite the fact that the latter use additional class information. The technique is able to cope with noise in the training set, and is applicable to a broad range of classification and pattern recognition problems.
Index Terms:
Concept learning, Machine Learning, Classification, Clustering
Citation:
Andrew Skabar, Kousick Biswas, Binh Pham, Anthony Maeder, "Inductive Concept Learning in the Absence of Labeled Counter-Examples," acsc, pp.220, Australasian Computer Science Conference, 2000
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.