loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED '01)
Stopping Criteria Comparison: Towards High Quality Behavioral Verification
San Jose, California
March 26-March 28
ISBN: 0-7695-1025-6
Amjad Hajjar, Colorado State University
Tom Chen, Colorado State University
Isabelle Munn, Colorado State University
Anneliese Andrews, Colorado State University
Maria Bjorkman, Colorado State University
Verification of complex behavioral models has become a critical and time-consuming process. Determine when to switch to different testing strategy phase is key to improving efficiency. This paper presents an overview of the existing statistical stopping rules that can be used for behavioral models verification. We examined the stopping rules using two VHDL models for five consecutive test phases. The results of the coverage gained and the number of testing patterns applied are then compared for each stopping rule. We conclude that the confidence-based stopping criterion out-performs others in terms of efficiency.
Citation:
Amjad Hajjar, Tom Chen, Isabelle Munn, Anneliese Andrews, Maria Bjorkman, "Stopping Criteria Comparison: Towards High Quality Behavioral Verification," isqed, pp.31, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED '01), 2001
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.