loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'03)
The Case for Fair Multiprocessor Scheduling
Nice, France
April 22-April 26
ISBN: 0-7695-1926-1
Anand Srinivasan, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Philip Holman, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
James H. Anderson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sanjoy Baruah, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
In this paper, we compare the PD2 Pfair algorithm to the EDF-FF partitioning scheme, which uses "first fit" (FF) as a partitioning heuristic and the earliest-deadline-first (EDF) algorithm for per-processor scheduling. We present experimental results that show that PD2 is competitive with, and in some cases outperforms, EDF-FF. These results suggest that Pfair scheduling is a viable alternative to partitioning. Furthermore, as discussed herein, Pfair scheduling provides many additional benefits, such as simple and efficient synchronization, temporal isolation, fault tolerance, and support for dynamic tasks.
Index Terms:
Fair scheduling, multiprocessors, partitioning, Pfairness, real-time systems
Citation:
Anand Srinivasan, Philip Holman, James H. Anderson, Sanjoy Baruah, "The Case for Fair Multiprocessor Scheduling," ipdps, pp.114a, International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'03), 2003
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.