loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'04) - Volume 2
To FRAME or not to FRAME in Probabilistic Texture Modelling?
Cambridge UK
August 23-August 26
ISBN: 0-7695-2128-2
Georgy Gimel'farb, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Luc Van Gool, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland
Alexey Zalesny, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland
The maximum entropy principle is a cornerstone of FRAME (Filters, RAndom fields, and Maximum Entropy) model considered at times as a first-ever step towards a universal theory of texture modelling or even as "the inevitable texture model". This paper disputes such opinions. That a wealth of exponential families of probability distributions is deduced from the ME principle is well known for decades. The ME property by itself in no way leads to an adequate probabilistic description, and to model a particular texture, specific limitations have to be imposed on signal statistics. Frequency distributions of outputs from a bank of linear filters (the second FRAME's cornerstone) are hardly the only choice outperforming all other alternatives. The paper points also to other hidden drawbacks of FRAME.
Citation:
Georgy Gimel'farb, Luc Van Gool, Alexey Zalesny, "To FRAME or not to FRAME in Probabilistic Texture Modelling?," icpr, vol. 2, pp.707-711, 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'04) - Volume 2, 2004
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.