loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'02)
Interruptions as Multimodal Outputs: Which are the Less Disruptive?
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
October 14-October 16
ISBN: 0-7695-1834-6
Ernesto Arroyo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Ted Selker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Alexandre Stouffs, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This paper describes exploratory studies of interruption modalities and disruptiveness. Five interruption modalities were compared: Heat, Smell, Sound, Vibration, and Light. Much more notable than the differences between modalities was the differences between people. We found that subjects? sensitiveness depended on their previous life exposure to the modalities.

Individual differences greatly control the effect of interrupting stimuli .We show that is possible to build multimodal adaptive interruption interface, such interfaces would dynamically select the output interruption modality to use based on its effectiveness on a particular user.

Index Terms:
Interruption modalities, interface design, modalities of interaction, multimodal interfaces, self-adaptive interfaces
Citation:
Ernesto Arroyo, Ted Selker, Alexandre Stouffs, "Interruptions as Multimodal Outputs: Which are the Less Disruptive?," icmi, pp.479, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'02), 2002
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.