loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 8
Big Island, Hawaii
January 05-January 08
ISBN: 0-7695-2056-1
Scott McCoy, College of William & Mary
Peter V. Marks, Jr., US Army Medical Department
Christopher L. Carr, University of Pittsburgh
Victor Mbarika, Louisiana State University
The Internet and World Wide Web are increasingly being used for survey distribution and administration in both academic and practitioner research. Little systematic research exists on the efficacy of these survey administration media or their potential psychometric effects. This paper reports on a study of the potential biasing effects of online versus paper surveys. We consider issues specifically related to the information systems research context and introduce psychometric issues of general interest to those considering testing for response stability between online and paper survey administration. The study provides an assessment of the psychometric differences between paper-and-pencil and online survey administration for the well-known Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) instrument. The results indicate that biasing effects can occur which significantly reduce the stability of an instrument across administration methods. We sound a cautionary note on the practice of placing any existing paper-and-pencil survey instrument on the web without consideration of the biasing effects of web-based survey administration.
Citation:
Scott McCoy, Peter V. Marks, Jr., Christopher L. Carr, Victor Mbarika, "Electronic Versus Paper Surveys: Analysis of Potential Psychometric Biases," hicss, vol. 8, pp.80265c, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 8, 2004
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.