loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 8
Big Island, Hawaii
January 07-January 10
ISBN: 0-7695-1435-9
IT professionals are finding that more of their IT investments are being measured against a knowledge management (KM) metric. Those who want to deploy foundation technologies such as groupware, CRM or decision support tools, but fail to justify them on the basis of their contribution to KM, may find it difficult to get funding unless they can frame them within the KM context. Determining KM's pervasiveness and impact is analogous to measuring the contribution of marketing, employee development, or any other management or organizational competency. This paper addresses the problem of developing measurement models for KM metrics and discusses what current KM metrics are in use, and examine their sustainability and soundness in assessing knowledge utilization and retention of generating revenue. The paper will then discuss the use of a Balanced Scorecard approach to determine a business-oriented relationship between strategic KM usage and IT strategy and implementation.
Index Terms:
Knowledge Utilization; IS Investment; Management Issues
Citation:
A. Fairchild, "Knowledge Management Metrics via a Balanced Scorecard Methodology," hicss, vol. 8, pp.243, 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 8, 2002
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.