loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
5th IEEE Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems
Centralized versus Distributed Schemes for Videoconferencing
Chenju, Korea
August 28-August 30
ISBN: 0-8186-7125-4
M. H. Willebeek-LeMair, T. J. Watson Research Center
Z.-Y. Shae, T. J. Watson Research Center
Videoconferencing has become one of the major applications which is driving new computing and communication technologies. Solutions for the circuit switched and packet-based networks differ considerably. The H.320 ITU Standard has defined a solution for videoconferencing over N-ISDN. This standard advocates a centralized approach to multiparty conferencing based on a multipoint control unit (MCU). Various aspects of the H.320 standard are clearly reusable in packet-switched environments while others are not. In this paper we examine the differences between a centralized MCU multiparty conference approach and a distributed multiconference approach which leverages some of the capabilities of the packet-based networks. Each approach has distinct advantages and disadvantages. We discuss these and present a distributed Multimedia Multiparty Teleconferencing (MMT) system we have implemented.
Index Terms:
Videoconferencing, Multimedia, Multipoint Control Unit
Citation:
M. H. Willebeek-LeMair, Z.-Y. Shae, "Centralized versus Distributed Schemes for Videoconferencing," ftdcs, pp.0085, 5th IEEE Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 1995
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.