loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems
Using Automatable Proof Obligations for Component-Based Design Checking
Nashville, Tennessee
March 07-March 12
ISBN: 0-7695-0028-5
Murali Rangarajan, University of Cincinnati
Perry Alexander, University of Cincinnati
Nael Abu-Ghazaleh, State University of New York at Binghamton
The complexity of modern systems is reflected in a proportionate increase in the complexity of their design and verification. Formal analysis methods are of particular interest because they provide the mathematical foundation necessary for rigorous analysis; successful formal analysis of a system provides a high level of assurance of correctness and conformance with specifications. Unfortunately, for a number of reasons, formal analysis techniques have failed to scale to large systems. In traditional engineering disciplines, decomposition and component-based design activities have contributed substantially to effective design of large systems. Consequently, this paper presents some proof obligations that perform partial correctness checks on hierarchically designed systems. Since the obligations are applied locally, they avoid the state explosion associated with formal analysis of a large system. The obligations represent initial steps towards the goal of decompositional verification of designs.
Index Terms:
Design Checking, Compositional Analysis, Formal Verification, PVS
Citation:
Murali Rangarajan, Perry Alexander, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh, "Using Automatable Proof Obligations for Component-Based Design Checking," ecbs, pp.304, IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 1999
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.