loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Eighth Euromicro Working Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'04)
Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build
Tampere, Finland
March 24-March 26
ISBN: 0-7695-2107-X
ASCII Text
x 
 
Mira Kajko-Mattsson, Marcus Jonson, Saam Koroorian, Fredrik Westin, "Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build," Software Maintenance and Reengineering, European Conference on, pp. 137, Eighth Euromicro Working Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'04), 2004.
 
 
BibTex
x
 
@article{ 10.1109/CSMR.2004.1281414,
author = {Mira Kajko-Mattsson and Marcus Jonson and Saam Koroorian and Fredrik Westin},
title = {Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build},
journal ={Software Maintenance and Reengineering, European Conference on},
volume = {0},
year = {2004},
issn = {1534-5351},
pages = {137},
doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CSMR.2004.1281414},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
}
 
 
RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
x 
 
TY - CONF
JO - Software Maintenance and Reengineering, European Conference on
TI - Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build
SN - 1534-5351
SP
EP
A1 - Mira Kajko-Mattsson,
A1 - Marcus Jonson,
A1 - Saam Koroorian,
A1 - Fredrik Westin,
PY - 2004
KW - Daily build engineer
KW - concurrent engineering
KW - incremental software development
KW - feature teams
KW - automated tests
KW - regression tests
KW - smoke tests
VL - 0
JA - Software Maintenance and Reengineering, European Conference on
ER -
 
Mira Kajko-Mattsson, Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology
Marcus Jonson, Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology
Saam Koroorian, Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology
Fredrik Westin, Front End AB, Sweden
We were commissioned to establish one organisation's possibility to implement a daily build process. For this purpose, we have developed a model aiding us in evaluating the organisation's readiness to implement the process. In this paper, we present our evaluation model and the lesson learned from using it when attempting to determine the organisation's readiness to fully integrate a daily build process with their already extant software development and evolution processes.
Index Terms:
Daily build engineer, concurrent engineering, incremental software development, feature teams, automated tests, regression tests, smoke tests
Citation:
Mira Kajko-Mattsson, Marcus Jonson, Saam Koroorian, Fredrik Westin, "Lesson Learned from Attempts to Implement Daily Build," csmr, pp.137, Eighth Euromicro Working Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'04), 2004
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.