loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Third International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC '97)
Using Metrics for Proof Rules for Recursively Defined Delay-insensitive Specifications
Eindhoven, THE NETHERLANDS
April 07-April 10
ISBN: 0-8186-7922-0
Willem C. Mallon, Department of Computing Science, Groningen University, Netherlands
Jan Tijmen Udding, Department of Computing Science, Groningen University, Netherlands
An advantage of algebraic specifications of delay insensitive asynchronous processes over most other formalisms is that it allows the recursive definition of processes, and correctness proofs of an implementation through fixpoint induction. On the other hand, proofs by fixpoint induction are intrinsically hard to design and read, which led us to use a much more palatable proof style, using so-called linear proofs and induction. Until now, the intuitive induction rule has never been formalized, and formalizing it, as we do in this paper shows that extreme care has to be taken to phrase the proof rule that is being used. Fortunately, the rules that we derive in this paper validate the proofs that used the intuitive notion, and its formulation is such that it can easily be included in theorem provers and other tools.
Index Terms:
algebraic specification, algebraic specifications, proof rules, delay-insensitive specifications, correctness proofs, recursive definition, linear proofs, intuitive induction rule, proof rule, theorem provers
Citation:
Willem C. Mallon, Jan Tijmen Udding, "Using Metrics for Proof Rules for Recursively Defined Delay-insensitive Specifications," async, pp.175, Third International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (ASYNC '97), 1997
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.