loading...
 This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'00)
Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective
Singapore
December 05-December 08
ISBN: 0-7695-0915-0
B. Henderson-Sellers, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
R. Due, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
I. Graham, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
G. Collins, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
Second generation OO methods, with a few exceptions, contained no elements addressing process or project management. Third generation methods have been defined as those collaborative developments which also have a significant process element. Two examples are the rational unified process (RUP) and object-oriented process, environment and notation (OPEN). We examine RUP and OPEN from a project management viewpoint and evaluate whether either or both would meet acceptable standards in process support, project management guidelines and full lifecycle description for OO software development.
Index Terms:
project management; object-oriented methods; software development management; third generation object-oriented processes; RUP; OPEN; project management; rational unified process; object-oriented process environment and notation; process support; full lifecycle description; object-oriented software development
Citation:
B. Henderson-Sellers, R. Due, I. Graham, G. Collins, "Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective," apsec, pp.428, Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'00), 2000
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.