The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel

	This Article
	Subscribers, please Login Purchase article: $19 PDF HTML RSS feed
	Share
	Email this Article to a friend
	Bibliographic References
	ASCII Text BibTex RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote
	Add to:
	Digg Furl Spurl Blink Simpy Google Del.icio.us Y!MyWeb
	Search
	Similar Articles

July/August 2003 (vol. 23 no. 4)

pp. 73-77

	ASCII Text	x
	"The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel," IEEE Micro, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 73-77, July/August, 2003.

	BibTex	x
	@article{ 10.1109/MM.2003.10005, author = {}, title = {The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel}, journal ={IEEE Micro}, volume = {23}, number = {4}, issn = {0272-1732}, year = {2003}, pages = {73-77}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2003.10005}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, }

	RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote	x
	TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Micro TI - The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel IS - 4 SN - 0272-1732 SP73 EP77 EPD - 73-77 PY - 2003 VL - 23 JA - IEEE Micro ER -

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2003.10005

The majority of papers published by computer architecture conferences use the spec benchmark suite to measure performance. However, many researchers use only a subset of the suite. What's more surprising is how few people explain their reasons for subsetting.

Moderator: John Hennessy; Panelists: Daniel Citron, David Patterson, and Guri Sohi

Citation:

"The Use and Abuse of SPEC: An ISCA Panel," IEEE Micro, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 73-77, July/Aug. 2003, doi:10.1109/MM.2003.10005

Peer Review Notice | Give Us Feedback

Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.