<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>law_podcast</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/rss" />
  <subtitle>law_podcast</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Computing and the Law: Who Invents What</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-who-invents-what" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-who-invents-what</id>
    <updated>2013-05-02T17:10:11Z</updated>
    <published>2013-05-02T17:09:07Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Author Brian M. Gaff provides an audio recording of the Computing and the Law column, in which he discusses how determining who to name as an inventor on a US patent can sometimes be more difficult than expected, and how mistakes in doing so can prove costly. From Computer's May 2013 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2013/05/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; 
&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/J5F-yCsOQ0w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-02T17:09:07Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computing and the Law: Patent Monetization</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-patent-monetization" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-patent-monetization</id>
    <updated>2013-04-04T15:33:27Z</updated>
    <published>2013-04-04T15:32:43Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Authors Brian M. Gaff and Ralph A. Loren provide an audio recording of the Computing and the Law column, in which they discuss how companies and institutions can obtain value from the patents theyíve acquired--especially in cases where they aren't otherwise exploiting them. From Computer's April 2013 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2013/04/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AXAeq9GQqc0" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T15:32:43Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computing and the Law: Design Patents</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-design-patents" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-design-patents</id>
    <updated>2013-03-05T22:05:48Z</updated>
    <published>2013-03-05T22:01:50Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Brian M. Gaff and Peter J. Cuomo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Authors Brian M. Gaff and Peter J. Cuomo provide an audio recording of the Computing and the Law column, in which they discuss how design patents, though once relatively uncommon, are now used aggressively andóas recent events have shownócan lead to significant liability for those found to infringe them. From Computer's March 2013 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2013/03/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the March 2013 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YXSXjj4QLZU" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-05T22:01:50Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computing and the Law: Paying Bribes Abroad Will Get You in Hot Water in the US</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-paying-bribes-abroad-will-get-you-in-hot-water-in-the-us" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/computing-and-the-law:-paying-bribes-abroad-will-get-you-in-hot-water-in-the-us</id>
    <updated>2013-01-31T17:58:25Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-31T16:39:35Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Brian M. Gaff, Stephen G. Huggard, and Gregory W. Carey&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Because of its broad and ambiguous language, the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits much more conduct than most people might think. From Computer's February 2013 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2013/02/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the February 2013 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/h47mHk7t9mg" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-31T16:39:35Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protecting Bioinformatics as Intellectual Property</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/protecting-bioinformatics-as-intellectual-proper-1" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/protecting-bioinformatics-as-intellectual-proper-1</id>
    <updated>2013-01-11T18:59:35Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-11T18:57:48Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Although trade secrets and copyright provide some protection to bioinformatics tools, a carefully drafted patent can provide the broadest available protection in an increasingly competitive market. From Computer's January 2013 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2013/01/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer./&lt;p&gt;

&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5_z0TRzGoVk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-11T18:57:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Employment Issues Confronting Start-Up Companies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/employment-issues-confronting-start-up-companies" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/employment-issues-confronting-start-up-companies</id>
    <updated>2013-01-11T18:56:40Z</updated>
    <published>2013-01-11T18:50:30Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	The twelfth in a series of articles in Computer magazine provides basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets discusses employment law issues faced by new companies. From Computer's December 2012 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2012/12/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NUxG-zoM1gE?list=PLHJB2bhmgB7d89HoNVyImEcCzLDnJwJEU" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-11T18:50:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Brief Overview of the America Invents Act</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/a-brief-overview-of-the-america-invents-act" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/a-brief-overview-of-the-america-invents-act</id>
    <updated>2012-11-17T00:13:37Z</updated>
    <published>2012-11-16T21:59:56Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff, Ralph A. Loren, and Amy M. DeCloux&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	A series of articles in Computer magazine provides basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets; in this installment, the authors discuss the America Invents Act. From Computer's November 2012 issue: http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/co/2012/11/index.html. Visit Computer: http://www.computer.org/computer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the Novemeber 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WUjsIQOabxs" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-16T21:59:56Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Starting a Business: Which Entity Structure Is Best for You?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/starting-a-business:-which-entity-structure-is-best-for-yo-1" />
    <author>
      <name>Ben Jones</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/starting-a-business:-which-entity-structure-is-best-for-yo-1</id>
    <updated>2012-10-02T18:17:23Z</updated>
    <published>2012-10-02T18:17:22Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff and Karl P. Fryzel&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	In the tenth in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets, the authors discuss the different types of corporate entities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the October 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eO5tKt5UJAQ" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Ben Jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-02T18:17:22Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform: New Tools for Challenging Patent Validity as of September 2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-reform:-new-tools-for-challenging-patent-validity-as-of-september-2012" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-reform:-new-tools-for-challenging-patent-validity-as-of-september-2012</id>
    <updated>2012-09-17T20:30:24Z</updated>
    <published>2012-09-15T17:13:20Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff, Brian P. Murphy, Ralph A. Loren, Christine A. Dudzik, and Lisa Swiszcz&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	In the ninth in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses, Computing and the Law contributors Brian M. Gaff, Brian P. Murphy, Ralph A. Loren, Christine A. Dudzik, and Lisa Swiszcz examine strategic considerations in seeking and defending against new post-grant review procedures under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the September 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AehKR76JKWU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-15T17:13:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Doing Business in China</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/doing-business-in-china" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/doing-business-in-china</id>
    <updated>2012-07-27T17:52:47Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-27T17:49:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff, Kenneth Choy, and Jamie Chan&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	The eighth in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets discusses some issues that can occur when doing business in the People’s Republic of China.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the August 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cmTuxZBVEnI" width="420"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-27T17:49:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Raising Capital: Where to Find It, How to Secure It, and Tips on What to Avoid</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/raising-capital:-where-to-find-it-how-to-secure-it-and-tips-on-what-to-avoid" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/raising-capital:-where-to-find-it-how-to-secure-it-and-tips-on-what-to-avoid</id>
    <updated>2012-07-09T22:45:43Z</updated>
    <published>2012-07-09T22:45:11Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff, Richard N. Kimball, and Jill M. Hanson&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	In the latest podcast installment connected to the seventh in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets, Computing and the Law coauthors Brian M. Gaff, Richard N. Kimball, and Jill M. Hanson explore ways to raise capital.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the July 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3lYpjoONWn8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T22:45:11Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open Source Software</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/open-source-software" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/open-source-software</id>
    <updated>2012-06-19T00:22:20Z</updated>
    <published>2012-06-19T00:20:27Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	by Brian M. Gaff and Gregory J. Ploussios&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	In the latest podcast installment connected to the sixth in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets focuses on open source software, Computing and the Law coauthors Brian M. Gaff and Gregory J. Ploussios discuss common legal pitfalls that businesses encounter and when and why businesses should be prepared to get legal advice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This episode comes from the June 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8fCFrSv9cjE" width="560"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-19T00:20:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do I Need A Lawyer? If You Have to Ask, You Probably Do</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/do-i-need-a-lawyer-if-you-have-to-ask-you-probably-do" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/do-i-need-a-lawyer-if-you-have-to-ask-you-probably-do</id>
    <updated>2012-05-04T17:39:29Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-04T17:39:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff, Stephen G. Huggard, and Gregory W. Carey&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In the latest podcast installment connected to the fifth in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets, Computing and the Law coauthors Brian M. Gaff, Stephen G. Huggard, and Gregory W. Carey discuss common legal pitfalls that businesses encounter and when and why businesses should be prepared to get legal advice.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This episode comes from the May 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed width="470" height="20" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0008-v.mp3"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-04T17:39:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defending Against Patent Infringement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/defending-against-patent-infringement" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/defending-against-patent-infringement</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T22:40:26Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-28T23:24:21Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff, Brian P. Murphy, and Peter J. Cuomo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this podcast connected to the fourth  in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets, Computing and the Law coauthors Brian M. Gaff, Brian P. Murphy, and Peter J. Cuomo explore patent litigation from the defendant&amp;rsquo;s perspective.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This episode comes from the April 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed width="470" height="20" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0007-v.mp3"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-28T23:24:21Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Privacy and Data Security</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/privacy-and-data-security" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/privacy-and-data-security</id>
    <updated>2012-02-28T22:24:49Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-28T22:23:30Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff, Thomas J. Smedinghoff, and Socheth Sor&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The third in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets focuses on privacy and data security.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This episode comes from the March 2012 issue of &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed width="470" height="20" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0006-v.mp3"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-28T22:23:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property, Part II</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/intellectual-property-part-ii" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/intellectual-property-part-ii</id>
    <updated>2012-01-26T18:32:27Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-26T18:32:27Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff and Ralph A. Loren&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The second in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets focuses on the enforcement of intellectual property rights.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This episode comes from the February 2012 issue of &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://opac.ieeecomputersociety.org/opac?year=2012&amp;amp;volume=45&amp;amp;issue=2&amp;amp;acronym=computer"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed height="20" width="470" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0005-v.mp3"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-26T18:32:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property, Part I</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/intellectual-property-part-i" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/intellectual-property-part-i</id>
    <updated>2012-01-18T22:58:28Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-18T22:56:45Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff and Ralph A. Loren&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first in a series of articles providing basic information on legal issues facing people and businesses that operate in computing-related markets focuses on protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights. This Web extra podcast features Brian M. Gaff and Ralph A. Loren of Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP discuss protection and enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This episode comes from the January 2012 issue of &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://opac.ieeecomputersociety.org/opac?year=2012&amp;amp;volume=45&amp;amp;issue=1&amp;amp;acronym=computer"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;embed width="470" height="20" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0004-v.mp3"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-18T22:56:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ten Things to Know When Your Patent Application Is Allowed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/ten-things-to-know-when-your-patent-application-is-allowed" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/ten-things-to-know-when-your-patent-application-is-allowed</id>
    <updated>2011-09-29T19:43:49Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-29T19:43:15Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff and Catherine J. Toppin&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; An episode &lt;a href="http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2011.295" target="_blank"&gt;based on an article&lt;/a&gt; published in &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;'s &lt;a href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/abs/mags/co/2011/09/toc.htm" target="_blank"&gt;September 2011 issue&lt;/a&gt; reviews basic points to keep in mind once you've successfully filed for a patent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed width="470" height="20" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0003-v.mp3" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="undefined" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T19:43:15Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law: Ten Things to Know When Your Patent Application Is Pending</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-law:-ten-things-to-know-when-your-patent-application-is-pending" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-law:-ten-things-to-know-when-your-patent-application-is-pending</id>
    <updated>2011-09-08T00:12:04Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-08T00:11:43Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff and Catherine J. Toppin&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;An&amp;nbsp; episode based on an article published in &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;'s &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/abs/mags/co/2011/08/toc.htm"&gt;August 2011 issue&lt;/a&gt; that provides &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2011.253"&gt;basic points to keep in mind while your patent application is pending&lt;/a&gt;. This is the second in a series of three articles.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed height="20" width="470" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0002-v.mp3" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="undefined" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-08T00:11:43Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law: Ten Things to Know When Applying for a Patent</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-law:-ten-things-to-know-when-applying-for-a-patent" />
    <author>
      <name>Monette Velasco</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/computing-and-the-law/-/blogs/patent-law:-ten-things-to-know-when-applying-for-a-patent</id>
    <updated>2011-08-26T17:15:57Z</updated>
    <published>2011-08-19T20:34:23Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Brian M. Gaff and Catherine J. Toppin&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;An&amp;nbsp; episode &lt;a href="http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2011.219" target="_blank"&gt;based on an article&lt;/a&gt; published in &lt;em&gt;Computer&lt;/em&gt;'s &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/abs/mags/co/2011/07/toc.htm"&gt;July 2011 issue&lt;/a&gt; reviews basic points to keep in mind when filing for a patent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;embed height="20" width="470" flashvars="file=http://media.computer.org/sponsored/podcast/computinglaw/law-0001-v.mp3" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="undefined" src="http://www.computer.org/portal/cms/Computer.org/csmediacenter/mediaplayer/player.swf"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Monette Velasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-19T20:34:23Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

