This Article 
 Bibliographic References 
 Add to: 
Doubt and Software Standards
September/October 2009 (vol. 26 no. 5)
pp. 104, 103
Robert L. Glass, Griffith University
The software engineering community needs to take a more critical view of software standards.

1. J. Rost, "Are 'Best Practices' Requirements Documents a Myth?" IEEE Software, May/June 2006, pp. 104, 103.
2. B. Kitchenham, D.R. Jeffery, and C. Connaughton, "Misleading Metrics and Unsound Analyses," IEEE Software, Mar./Apr. 2007, pp. 73–78.
3. H. Al-Kilidar, K. Cox, and B. Kitchenham, "The Use and Usefulness of the ISO/IEC 9126 Quality Standard," Proc. 2005 Int'l Symp. Empirical Software Eng. (ISESE 05), IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 126–132.
4. M. Jorgensen, "Software Quality Measurement," Advances in Eng. Software, vol. 30, no. 12, 1999, pp. 907–919.
5. M. Thomas, "Unsafe Standardization," Computer, Nov. 1997, pp. 109–111.
6. S. Santini, "Standards: What Are They Good For?" Computer, Dec. 2006, pp. 140, 139.
7. S. Garcia, "How Standards Enable Adoption of Project Management Practice," IEEE Software, Sept./Oct. 2005, pp. 22–29.

Index Terms:
software engineering, software standards
Robert L. Glass, "Doubt and Software Standards," IEEE Software, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 104, 103, Sept.-Oct. 2009, doi:10.1109/MS.2009.126
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.