|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Les Hatton, "Does OO Sync with How We Think?," IEEE Software, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 46-54, May/June, 1998. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/52.676735, author = {Les Hatton}, title = {Does OO Sync with How We Think?}, journal ={IEEE Software}, volume = {15}, number = {3}, issn = {0740-7459}, year = {1998}, pages = {46-54}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/52.676735}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Software TI - Does OO Sync with How We Think? IS - 3 SN - 0740-7459 SP46 EP54 EPD - 46-54 A1 - Les Hatton, PY - 1998 VL - 15 JA - IEEE Software ER - | |||
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/52.676735
Given that corrective-maintenance costs already dominate the software life cycle and look set to increase significantly, reliability in the form of reducing such costs should be the most important software improvement goal. Yet the results are not promising when we review recent corrective-maintenance data for big systems in general and for OO in particular-possibly because of mismatches between the OO paradigm and how we think.
Citation:
Les Hatton, "Does OO Sync with How We Think?," IEEE Software, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 46-54, May-June 1998, doi:10.1109/52.676735
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.

