Subscribe

Issue No.04 - July/August (2008 vol.34)

pp: 471-484

Barbara A. Kitchenham , National ICT Australia, Sydney

David Ross Jeffery , National ICT Australia Ltd. The University of New South Wales, Sydney

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TSE.2008.34

ABSTRACT

Abstract?Data-intensive analogy has been proposed as a means of software cost estimation as an alternative to other data intensive methods such as linear regression. Unfortunately, there are drawbacks to the method. There is no mechanism to assess its appropriateness for a specific dataset. In addition, heuristic algorithms are necessary to select the best set of variables and identify abnormal project cases. We introduce a solution to these problems based upon the use of the Mantel correlation randomization test called Analogy-X. We use the strength of correlation between the distance matrix of project features and the distance matrix of known effort values of the dataset. The method is demonstrated using the Desharnais dataset and two random datasets, showing (1) the use of Mantel?s correlation to identify whether analogy is appropriate, (2) a stepwise procedure for feature selection, as well as (3) the use of a leverage statistic for sensitivity analysis that detects abnormal data points. Analogy-X, thus, provides a sound statistical basis for analogy, removes the need for heuristic search and greatly improves its algorithmic performance.

INDEX TERMS

Cost estimation, Management, Statistical methods, Software Engineering

CITATION

Barbara A. Kitchenham, David Ross Jeffery, "Analogy-X: Providing Statistical Inference to Analogy-Based Software Cost Estimation",

*IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering*, vol.34, no. 4, pp. 471-484, July/August 2008, doi:10.1109/TSE.2008.34REFERENCES

- [1] C. Schofield, “Software Support for Cost Estimation by Analogy,”
Proc. Sixth European Software Cost Modeling Conf., 1995.- [2] C. Schofield and M.J. Shepperd, “Effort Estimation by Analogy: A Case Study,”
Proc. Seventh European Software Control and Metrics Conf., 1996.- [3] M.J. Shepperd, C. Schofield, and B. Kitchenham, “Effort Estimation Using Analogy,”
Proc. 18th Int'l Conf. Software Eng., 1996.- [4] B.W. Boehm, “Software Engineering Economics,”
IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 10, pp. 4-21, 1984.- [7] K. Atkinson and M.J. Shepperd, “The Use of Function Points to Find Cost Analogies,”
Proc. European Software Cost Modeling Meeting, 1994.- [8] E. Stensrud and I. Myrtveit, “The Added Value of Estimation by Analogy: An Industrial Experiment,”
Proc. Ninth European Software Control and Metrics Conf., 1998.- [9] F. Walkerden, “An Empirical Study of Analogy-Based Software Effort Estimation,”
Empirical Software Eng., vol. 4, pp. 135-158, 1999.- [10] L. Angelis and I. Stamelos, “A Simulation Tool for Efficient Analogy Based Cost Estimation,”
Empirical Software Eng., vol. 5, pp. 35-68, 2000.- [12] E. Mendes and B. Kitchenham, “Further Comparison of Cross-Company and Within-Company Effort Estimation Models for Web Applications,”
Proc. 10th Int'l Software Metrics Symp., pp. 348-357, 2004.- [15] R. Jeffery, M. Ruhe, and I. Wieczorek, “Using Public Domain Metrics to Estimate Software Development Effort,”
Proc. Seventh Int'l Software Metrics Symp., 2001.- [17] M.J. Shepperd and G. Kadoda, “Using Simulation to Evaluate Prediction Techniques,”
Proc. Seventh Int'l Software Metrics Symp., 2001.- [19] M. Jorgensen and D. Sjoberg, “Expert Estimation of Software Development Work,”
Software Evolution and Feedback: Theory and Practice. Wiley, 2006.- [22] M. Jorgensen, “Estimation of Software Development Work Effort: Evidence on Expert Judgement and Formal Models,”
Int'l J. Forecasting, 2007.- [23] C. Kirsopp, M. Shepperd, and J. Hart, “Search Heuristics, Case-Based Reasoning and Software Project Effort Prediction,”
Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf., pp. 1367-1374, 2002.- [24] J. Li, G. Ruhe, A. Al-Emran, and M.M. Richter, A Flexible Method for Software Effort Estimation by Analogy,
Empirical Software Eng., http://www.kluweronline.com/issn1382-3256 , Apr. 2006.- [26] G.F. Kadoda, M. Cartwright, and M.J. Shepperd, “Issues on the Effective Use of CBR Technology for Software Project Prediction,”
Proc. Fourth Int'l Conf. Case-Based Reasoning: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development), pp. 276-290, 2001.- [27] N. Mantel, “The Detection of Disease Clustering and a Generalized Regression Approach,”
Cancer Research, vol. 27, pp. 209-220, 1967.- [28] B.F.J. Manly,
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, second ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1997.- [29] P. Legendre and L. Legendre,
Numerical Ecology, second ed. Elsevier, 1998.- [30] B.F.J. Manly,
Multivariate Statistical Methods—A Primer, second ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1998.- [31] F.H.C. Marriott, “Barnard's Monte Carlo Tests: How Many Simulations?”
Applied Statistics, vol. 28, 1979.- [32] R-Project, “The R Project for Statistical Computing,” http:/www.r-project.org, 2005.
- [33] ADE4, “Ecological Data Analysis (ADE4) Package for R,” http://pbil.univ-lyon1.frADE-4/, 2004.
- [34] VEGAN, “Vegan: R Functions for Community Ecology,” http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelpvegan.html , 2004.
- [35] J.W. Tukey, “Accurate Confidence Interval for the Ratio of Specific Occurrence/Exposure Rates in Risk and Survival Analysis,”
Biometrical J., vol. 37, p. 611, 1958.- [37] N.R. Draper and H. Smith,
Applied Regression Analysis, third ed. John Wiley and Sons, 1998. |