The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.10 - October (2006 vol.32)
pp: 790-811
ABSTRACT
Critical and catastrophic failures in high assurance and critical computing systems can arise from unfounded assumptions of independence between system components, requirements, and constraints (work product sections), which can stem from misunderstandings and miscommunication between system engineers, managers, and operators and from inadequate or incomplete traceability between system work products. In this article, we propose a formal framework for the effective implementation of traceability between work product sections along with a technique for discovering potential causes of critical failures in high assurance and critical computing system models. We introduce a new abstraction of interrelated work product sections called implementation meta-work product and describe how our technique finds these meta-work products. We also demonstrate how this technique can be used to help analysts discover potential causes of safety-related errors in high assurance and critical computing systems by applying it to one case study of a known critical error and to one case study where we anticipate potential safety hazards.
INDEX TERMS
Critical systems, data dependencies, emergent properties, formal frameworks, high assurance systems, knowledge modeling, set theory, software engineering documentation, system development, system safety, traceability, work products.
CITATION
Daniel Conte de Leon, Jim Alves-Foss, "Hidden Implementation Dependencies in High Assurance and Critical Computing Systems", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.32, no. 10, pp. 790-811, October 2006, doi:10.1109/TSE.2006.103
24 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool