This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
An Empirical Study of Software Project Bidding
December 2004 (vol. 30 no. 12)
pp. 953-969
The study described in this paper reports from a real-life bidding process in which 35 companies were bidding for the same contract. The bidding process consisted of two separate phases: a prestudy phase and a bidding phase. In the prestudy phase, 17 of the 35 bidding companies provided rough price indications based on a brief, incomplete description of user requirements. In the bidding phase, all 35 companies provided bids based on a more complete requirement specification that described a software system with substantially more functionality than the system indicated in the prestudy phase. The main result of the study is that the 17 companies involved in the prestudy phase presented bids that were, on average, about 70 percent higher than the bids of the other companies, although all companies based their bids on the same requirement specification. We propose an explanation for this difference that is consistent with the "prospect theory” and the "precautionary bidding effect.” A possible implication of our findings is that software clients should not request early price indications based on limited and uncertain information when the final bids can be based on more complete and reliable information.

[1] H. Kerzner, Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. Wiley, 2003.
[2] M. Jørgensen and K. Moløkken, “Understanding Reasons for Errors in Software Effort Estimates,” submitted for publication, 2004.
[3] M. Jørgensen and D.I.K. Sjøberg, “Impact of Effort Estimates on Software Project Work,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 939-948, 2001.
[4] B.G. Kingsman and A.A. Souza, “A Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Cost Estimation and Pricing Decision in Versatile Manufacturing Companies,” Int'l J. Production Economics, vol. 53, pp. 119-139, 1997.
[5] B. Kitchenham, L.M. Pickard, S. Linkman, and P.W. Jones, “Modeling Software Bidding Risks,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 542-554, June 2003.
[6] M. Jørgensen and D.I.K. Sjøberg, “The Impact of Customer Expectation on Software Development Effort Estimates,” Int'l J. Project Management, vol. 22, pp. 317-325, 2004.
[7] G. Whyte and J.K. Sebenius, “The Effect of Multiple Anchors on Anchoring in Individual and Group Judgment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 75-85, 1997.
[8] S. Plous, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, 1993.
[9] W.L. Hays, Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1963.
[10] J. Cohen, “A Power Primer,” Psychological Bull., vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 155-159, 1992.
[11] O.W. Gilley, G.V. Karels, and R.P. Leone, “Uncertainty, Experience and the `Winners Curse' in OCS Lease Bidding,” Management Science, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 673-682, 1986.
[12] C. Chapman and S. Ward, Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty: A Constructively Simple Approach to Decision Making. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley, 2002.
[13] N. Tweedley, Winning the Bid: A Manager's Guide to Competitive Bidding. London, U.K.: Pitman Publishing, 1995.
[14] M. Friedman and L. Savage, “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk,” J. Political Economy, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 279-304, 1948.
[15] H. Markowitz, “The Utility of Wealth,” J. Political Economy, vol. 60, pp. 151-156, 1952.
[16] P. Esö and L. White, “Precautionary Bidding in Auctions,” Centre for Economic Policy Research, discussion paper series No. 3975, London, pp. 1-33, 2003.
[17] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk,” Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 263-291, 1979.
[18] M. Jørgensen, K.H. Teigen, and K. Moløkken, “Better Sure than Safe? Overconfidence in Judgment Based Software Development Effort Prediction Intervals,” J. System and Software, vol. 70, nos. 1-2, pp. 79-93, 2004.
[19] K. Moløkken and M. Jørgensen, “A Review of Software Surveys on Software Effort Estimation,” Proc. Int'l Symp. Empirical Software Eng., pp. 223-230, 2003.

Index Terms:
Cost estimation, risk management, software psychology.
Citation:
Magne J?rgensen, Gunnar J. Carelius, "An Empirical Study of Software Project Bidding," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 953-969, Dec. 2004, doi:10.1109/TSE.2004.92
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.