This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
An Empirical Study of Representation Methods for Reusable Software Components
August 1994 (vol. 20 no. 8)
pp. 617-630

An empirical study of methods for representing reusable software components is described. Thirty-five subjects searched for reusable components in a database of UNIX tools using four different representation methods: attribute-value, enumerated, faceted, and keyword. The study used Proteus, a reuse library system that supports multiple representation methods. Searching effectiveness was measured with recall, precision, and overlap. Search time for the four methods was also compared. Subjects rated the methods in terms of preference and helpfulness in understanding components. Some principles for constructing reuse libraries. Based on the results of this study, are discussed.

[1] W. Frakes and T. Pole, "Proteus: A reuse Library system that supports multiple representation methods,"ACM SIGIR Forum.vol. 24, pp. 43-55, 1990.
[2] W. Frakes, "Software reuse as industrial experiment,"Amer. Programmer, vol. 6, pp. 27-33, 1993.
[3] T. J. Biggerstaff and A. J. Perlis,Software Reusability, vols. 1-2. New York: ACM Press, 1989.
[4] Freeman, Peter (ed.). 1987.Tutorial Software Reusability. Washington, D.C., IEEE Computer Society.
[5] W. Tracz,Software Reuse: Emerging Technology, IEEE CS Press, Order No. 846-01, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1988.
[6] B. Barnes and T. Bollinger, "Making reuse cost-effective,"IEEE Software, vol. 8, pp. 13-24, 1991.
[7] D. Batory, "Concepts for a database system compiler," in R. Prieto-Díaz and G. Arango, Eds.,Domain Anlysis and Software Systems Modeling. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1991.
[8] R. Prieto-Diaz and G. Arango,Domain Analysis and Software Systems Modeling, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamos, CA, 1991.
[9] W. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, Eds.,Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
[10] W. B. Frekes and P. B. Gandel, "Representing reusable software,"Inform. Software Technol., Nov. 1990.
[11] W. Tracz, "Software reuse myths," in W. Tracz, Ed.,Software Reuse: Emerging Technology. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1988.
[12] W. Frakes, "Software reuse: Payoff and transfer," inAIAA Computing in Aerospace 8 Conf., Baltimore, MD, USA, 1991.
[13] W. B. Frakes and C. J. Fox,Software Reuse Surv. Rep.Sterling, VA: Software Eng. Guild, 1993.
[14] P. Cashin, "BNR remains at the forefront of computing technology,"Telesis, vol. 92, pp. 73-75, 1991.
[15] C. Lillie, "Now is the time for a national software repository," inAIAA Comput. Aerospace, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1991.
[16] J. Tirso, "The IBM reuse program," in L. Latour, Ed.,4th Ann. Workshop on Software Reuse, Herndon, VA, USA, 1989.
[17] R. Prieto-Diaz, "Domain analysis: An introduction,"ACM Software Eng. Notes, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 47-54, Apr. 1990.
[18] P. Devanbu, R. Brachman, P. Selfridge, and B. Ballard, "LaSSIE: A knowledge-based software information system,"Commun. ACM, vol. 34, pp. 35-49, 1991.
[19] R. Prieto-Diaz, "Implementing faceted classification for software reuse,"Commun. ACM, vol. 34, pp. 88-97, 1991.
[20] W. Frakes and B. Nejmeh, "An information system for software reuse," in20th Ann. Haw. Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., Kona, HA, USA, 1987.
[21] K. Sparck-Jones, ed.Information Retrieval Experiment. London, UK: Butterworths, 1981.
[22] J. Katzer, M. McGill, J. Tessier, W. Frakes, and P. DasGupta, "A study of the overlaps among document representations," inJ. Information Technology: Research and Development. London: Butterworth, 1983, pp. 261-274.
[23] R. Prieto-Diaz, "A software classification scheme," Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA, USA, 1985.
[24] Y. Maarek, D. Berry, and G. Kaiser, "An information retrieval approach for automatically constructing software libraries,"IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 800-813, Aug. 1991.
[25] Y. Chang and C. Eastman,An Information Retrieval System for Reusable Software, 1991, (unpublished manuscript).
[26] R. Kirk,Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
[27] J. Wood,Joint Application Design: How to Design Quality Systems in 40% Less Time, New York: Wiley, 1989.
[28] R. Terry, personal commun., 1993.
[29] C. Donaldson, personal commun., 1993.
[30] J. Tukey,Exploratory Data Analysis, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

Index Terms:
software reusability; knowledge representation; subroutines; representation methods; reusable software components; UNIX tools; attribute-value; keyword; Proteus; reuse library system; multiple representation; software reuse; experimentation; empirical methods; information storage and retrieval; reuse libraries; component indexing; keyword searching; faceted classification; enumerated classification; component understanding; database
Citation:
W.B. Frakes, T.P. Pole, "An Empirical Study of Representation Methods for Reusable Software Components," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 617-630, Aug. 1994, doi:10.1109/32.310671
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.