The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan. (2014 vol.36)
pp: 73-85
Jaishanker K. Pillai , Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Maria Puertas , Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Rama Chellappa , Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
ABSTRACT
Due to the increasing popularity of iris biometrics, new sensors are being developed for acquiring iris images and existing ones are being continuously upgraded. Re-enrolling users every time a new sensor is deployed is expensive and time-consuming, especially in applications with a large number of enrolled users. However, recent studies show that cross-sensor matching, where the test samples are verified using data enrolled with a different sensor, often lead to reduced performance. In this paper, we propose a machine learning technique to mitigate the cross-sensor performance degradation by adapting the iris samples from one sensor to another. We first present a novel optimization framework for learning transformations on iris biometrics. We then utilize this framework for sensor adaptation, by reducing the distance between samples of the same class, and increasing it between samples of different classes, irrespective of the sensors acquiring them. Extensive evaluations on iris data from multiple sensors demonstrate that the proposed method leads to improvement in cross-sensor recognition accuracy. Furthermore, since the proposed technique requires minimal changes to the iris recognition pipeline, it can easily be incorporated into existing iris recognition systems.
INDEX TERMS
biometrics, Sensor shift, cross-sensor matching, Kernel learning, adaptation, iris,
CITATION
Jaishanker K. Pillai, Maria Puertas, Rama Chellappa, "Cross-Sensor Iris Recognition through Kernel Learning", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol.36, no. 1, pp. 73-85, Jan. 2014, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2013.98
REFERENCES
[1] K.W. Bowyer, K. Hollingsworth, and P.J. Flynn, "Image Understanding for Iris Biometrics: A Survey," Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 281-307, 2008.
[2] J.R. Matey and L.R. Kennell, "Iris Recognition—Beyond One Meter," Handbook of Remote Biometrics, M. Tistarelli, S.Z. Li, and R. Chellappa, eds., pp. 23-59, Springer, 2009.
[3] K. Bowyer, S. Baker, A. Hentz, K. Hollingsworth, T. Peters, and P. Flynn, "Factors That Degrade the Match Distribution in Iris Biometrics," Identity in the Information Soc., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 327-343, 2009.
[4] R. Connaughton, A. Sgroi, K.W. Bowyer, and P.J. Flynn, "A Cross-Sensor Evaluation of Three Commercial Iris Cameras for Iris Biometrics," Proc. IEEE CS Workshop Biometrics, pp. 90-97, 2011.
[5] J. Daugman, "High Confidence Visual Recognition of Persons by a Test of Statistical Independence," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1148-1161, Nov. 1993.
[6] K.W. Bowyer, K.P. Hollingsworth, and P.J. Flynn, "A Survey of Iris Biometrics Research: 2008-2010," Handbook of Iris Recognition, M. Burge and K.W. Bowyer, eds., Springer, 2013.
[7] A. Ross and A.K. Jain, "Biometric Sensor Interoperability: A Case Study in Fingerprints," Proc. Int'l ECCV Workshop Biometric Authentication, pp. 134-145, 2004.
[8] F. Alonso-Fernandez, R. Veldhuis, A. Bazen, J. Fierrez-Aguilar, and J. Ortega-Garcia, "Sensor Interoperability and Fusion in Fingerprint Verification: A Case Study Using Minutiae-and Ridge-Based Matchers," Proc. Int'l Conf. Control, Automation, Robotics, and Vision, pp. 1-6, 2006.
[9] F. Alonso-Fernandez, J. Fierrez, D. Ramos, and J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, "Quality-Based Conditional Processing in Multi-Biometrics: Application to Sensor Interoperability," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1168-1179, Nov. 2010.
[10] P. Phillips, A. Martin, C. Wilson, and M. Przybocki, "An Introduction Evaluating Biometric Systems," Computer, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 56-63, Feb. 2000.
[11] E. Gonzalez, A. Morales, M. Ferrer, and C. Travieso, "Looking for Hand Biometrics Interoperability," Proc. Int'l Conf. Hand-Based Biometrics, pp. 1-6, 2011.
[12] R. Connaughton, A. Sgroi, K.W. Bowyer, and P.J. Flynn, "A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors," IEEE Trans. Information Forensics and Security, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 919-931, June 2012.
[13] S.S. Arora, M. Vatsa, R. Singh, and A. Jain, "On Iris Camera Interoperability," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2012.
[14] T. Hofmann, B. Schölkopf, and A.J. Smola, "Kernel Methods in Machine Learning," Annals of Statistics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1171-1220, 2008.
[15] B.E. Boser, I. Guyon, and V. Vapnik, "A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers," Proc. Conf. Learning Theory, pp. 144-152, 1992.
[16] J.V. Davis, B. Kulis, P. Jain, S. Sra, and I.S. Dhillon, "Information-Theoretic Metric Learning," Proc. Int'l Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 209-216, 2007.
[17] K. Saenko, B. Kulis, M. Fritz, and T. Darrell, "Adapting Visual Category Models to New Domains," Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision, pp. 213-226, 2010.
[18] H. Van Nguyen, V.M. Patel, N. Nasrabadi, and R. Chellappa, "Kernel Dictionary Learning," Proc. Int'l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2012.
[19] H. Lodhi, C. Saunders, J. Shawe-Taylor, N. Cristianini, and C. Watkins, "Text Classification Using String Kernels," J. Machine Learning Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 419-444, 2002.
[20] S.V.N. Vishwanathan, A.J. Smola, and R. Vidal, "Binet-Cauchy Kernels on Dynamical Systems and Its Application to the Analysis of Dynamic Scenes," Int'l J. Computer Vision, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 95-119, 2007.
[21] K.Q. Weinberger, F. Sha, and L.K. Saul, "Learning a Kernel Matrix for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction," Proc. Int'l Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 839-846, 2004.
[22] C.M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics), first ed. Springer, 2007.
[23] M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, "Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering," Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 585-591, 2001.
[24] S.T. Roweis and L.K. Saul, "Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding," Science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2323-2326, 2000.
[25] S.J. Pan, I.W. Tsang, J.T. Kwok, and Q. Yang, "Domain Adaptation via Transfer Component Analysis," Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1187-1192, 2009.
[26] H.D. DauméIII and D. Marcu, "Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers," J. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 101-126, 2006.
[27] B. Kulis, M. Sustik, and I. Dhillon, "Learning Low-Rank Kernel Matrices," Proc. Int'l Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 505-512, 2006.
[28] L. Bregman, "The Relaxation Method of Finding the Common Point of Convex Sets and Its Application to the Solution of Problems in Convex Programming," USSR Computational Math. and Math. Physics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 200-217, 1967.
[29] A. Sgroi, K. Bowyer, and P. Flynn, "Cross Sensor Iris Recognition Competition," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2012.
[30] Y. Lee, R. Micheals, and P. Phillips, "Improvements in Video-Based Automated System for Iris Recognition (VASIR)," Proc. Workshop Motion and Video Computing, pp. 1-8, 2009.
[31] Y. Lee, R. Micheals, and P. Phillips, "Robust Iris Recognition Baseline for the Grand Challenge," Nat'l Inst. of Standards and Technology Interagency/Internal Report, 2011.
[32] VeriEye, http://www.neurotechnology.comverieye.html , 2013.
[33] J.E. Prussing, "The Principal Minor Test for Semidefinite Matrices," J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 121-122, 1986.
67 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool