The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - June (2008 vol.30)
pp: 1116-1117
Chengjun Liu , New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark
ABSTRACT
This paper first clarifies Assumption 3 (which misses a constant) and Assumption 4 (where the whitened pattern vectors refer to the whitened means) in paper "The Bayes Decision Rule Induced Similarity Measures" (IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence), vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1086-1090, 2007), and then provides examples to show that the assumptions after the clarification are consistent.
INDEX TERMS
Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Computer Vision
CITATION
Chengjun Liu, "Clarification of Assumptions in the Relationship between the Bayes Decision Rule and the Whitened Cosine Similarity Measure", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol.30, no. 6, pp. 1116-1117, June 2008, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2008.66
REFERENCES
[1] P.N. Belhumeur, J.P. Hespanha, and D.J. Kriegman, “Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 711-720, July 1997.
[2] K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, second ed. Academic Press, 1990.
[3] C. Liu, “The Bayes Decision Rule Induced Similarity Measures,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1086-1090, June 2007.
[4] M. Loog, “On Distributional Assumptions and Whitened Cosine Similarities,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1114-1115, June 2008.
[5] K.V. Mardia, J.T. Kent, and J.M. Bibby, Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, 1979.
5 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool