This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion
February 2008 (vol. 30 no. 2)
pp. 342-347
Multibiometric systems fuse information from different sources to compensate for the limitations in performance of individual matchers. We propose a framework for optimal combination of match scores that is based on the likelihood ratio test. The distributions of genuine and impostor match scores are modeled as finite Gaussian mixture model. The proposed fusion approach is general in its ability to handle (i) discrete values in biometric match score distributions, (ii) arbitrary scales and distributions of match scores, (iii) correlation between the scores of multiple matchers and (iv) sample quality of multiple biometric sources. Experiments on three multibiometric databases indicate that the proposed fusion framework achieves consistently high performance compared to commonly used score fusion techniques based on score transformation and classification.

[1] A. Ross, K. Nandakumar, and A.K. Jain, Handbook of Multibiometrics. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[2] R. Brunelli and D. Falavigna, “Person Identification Using Multiple Cues,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 955-966, Oct. 1995.
[3] S. Prabhakar and A.K. Jain, “Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 861-874, Apr. 2002.
[4] K.-A. Toh, X. Jiang, and W.-Y. Yau, “Exploiting Global and Local Decisions for Multimodal Biometrics Verification,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, supplement on secure media, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 3059-3072, Oct. 2004.
[5] Nat'l Inst. of Standards and Tech nology, NIST Biometric Scores Set— Release1, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.03biometricscores , 2004.
[6] R. Snelick, U. Uludag, A. Mink, M. Indovina, and A.K. Jain, “Large Scale Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using State-of-the-Art Systems,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 450-455, Mar. 2005.
[7] A.K. Jain, K. Nandakumar, and A. Ross, “Score Normalization in Multimodal Biometric Systems,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2270-2285, Dec. 2005.
[8] J. Fierrez-Aguilar, J. Ortega-Garcia, J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, and J. Bigun, “Discriminative Multimodal Biometric Authentication Based on Quality Measures,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 777-779, May 2005.
[9] Y. Ma, B. Cukic, and H. Singh, “A Classification Approach to Multi-biometric Score Fusion,” Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. Audio Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, pp. 484-493, July 2005.
[10] P. Griffin, “Optimal Biometric Fusion for Identity Verification,” Technical Report RDNJ-03-0064, Identix Research, 2004.
[11] B. Ulery, A.R. Hicklin, C. Watson, W. Fellner, and P. Hallinan, “Studies of Biometric Fusion,” Technical Report IR 7346, NIST, Sept. 2006.
[12] E.L. Lehmann and J.P. Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Springer, 2005.
[13] B.W. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, 1986.
[14] J.Q. Li and A. Barron, “Mixture Density Estimation,” Advances in Neural Information Processings Systems 12, S.A. Solla, T.K. Leen, and K.-R. Muller, eds., 1999.
[15] A. Rakhlin, D. Panchenko, and S. Mukherjee, “Risk Bounds for Mixture Density Estimation,” ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, vol. 9, pp. 220-229, June 2005.
[16] M. Figueiredo and A.K. Jain, “Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 381-396, Mar. 2002.
[17] C. Wilson, A.R. Hicklin, M. Bone, H. Korves, P. Grother, B. Ulery, R. Micheals, M. Zoepfl, S. Otto, and C. Watson, “Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation 2003: Summary of Results,” Technical Report IR 7123, NIST, June 2004.
[18] K.-A. Toh, W.-Y. Yau, E. Lim, L. Chen, and C.-H. Ng, “Fusion of Auxiliary Information for Multi-Modal Biometrics Authentication,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Biometric Authentication, pp.678-685, July 2004.
[19] N. Poh and S. Bengio, “Improving Fusion with Margin-Derived Confidence in Biometric Authentication Tasks,” Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. Audio Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, pp. 474-483, July 2005.
[20] J.P. Baker and D.E. Maurer, “Fusion of Biometric Data with Quality Estimates via a Bayesian Belief Network,” Proc. Biometrics Symp., pp. 21-22, Sept. 2005.
[21] K. Nandakumar, Y. Chen, A.K. Jain, and S. Dass, “Quality-Based Score Level Fusion in Multibiometric Systems,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Pattern Recognition, pp. 473-476, Aug. 2006.
[22] N. Poh and S. Bengio, “Database, Protocol and Tools for Evaluating Score-Level Fusion Algorithms in Biometric Authentication,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 223-233, Feb. 2006.
[23] J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R.P. Duin, and J.G. Matas, “On Combining Classifiers,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226-239, Mar. 1998.

Index Terms:
Multibiometric systems, score level fusion, Neyman-Pearson theorem, likelihood ratio test, Gaussian mixture model, image quality
Citation:
Karthik Nandakumar, Yi Chen, Sarat C. Dass, Anil Jain, "Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 342-347, Feb. 2008, doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70796
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.