This Article 
 Bibliographic References 
 Add to: 
Shape Similarity Measure Based on Correspondence of Visual Parts
October 2000 (vol. 22 no. 10)
pp. 1185-1190

Abstract—A cognitively motivated similarity measure is presented and its properties are analyzed with respect to retrieval of similar objects in image databases of silhouettes of 2D objects. To reduce influence of digitization noise, as well as segmentation errors, the shapes are simplified by a novel process of digital curve evolution. To compute our similarity measure, we first establish the best possible correspondence of visual parts (without explicitly computing the visual parts). Then, the similarity between corresponding parts is computed and aggregated. We applied our similarity measure to shape matching of object contours in various image databases and compared it to well-known approaches in the literature. The experimental results justify that our shape matching procedure gives an intuitive shape correspondence and is stable with respect to noise distortions.

[1] E.M. Arkin, L.P. Chew, D.P. Huttenlocher, K. Kedem, and J.S.B. Mitchell, "An Efficiently Computable Metric for Comparing Polygonal Shapes," IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 209-216, 1991.
[2] R. Basri, L. Costa, D. Geiger, and D. Jacobs, “Determining the Similarity of Deformable Shapes,” Vision Research, vol. 38, pp. 2,365-2,385, 1998.
[3] D.D. Hoffman and W.A. Richards, “Parts of Recognition,” Cognition, vol. 18, pp. 65-96, 1984.
[4] D.D. Hoffman and M. Singh, “Salience of Visual Parts,” Cognition, vol. 63, pp. 29-78, 1997.
[5] D.P. Huttenlocher, G.A. Klanderman, and W.J. Rucklidge, “Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 850-863, Sept. 1993.
[6] L.J. Latecki and R. Lakämper, “Convexity Rule for Shape Decomposition Based on Discrete Contour Evolution,” Image Understanding, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 441-454, 1999.
[7] L.J. Latecki and R. Lakämper, “Polygon Evolution by Vertex Deletion,” Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision Proc. Int'l Conf. Scale-Space '99, M. Nielsen, P. Johansen, O.F. Olsen, and J. Weickert, eds., Sept. 1999.
[8] L.J. Latecki, R. Lakämper, and U. Eckhardt shape.
[9] L.J. Latecki, R. Lakämper, and U. Eckhardt, “Shape Descriptors for Non-Rigid Shapes with a Single Closed Contour,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 424-429, 2000.
[10] F. Mokhtarian, S. Abbasi, and J. Kittler, “Efficient and Robust Retrieval by Shape Content through Curvature Scale Space,” Image Databases and Multi-Media Search, A.W.M. Smeulders and R. Jain, eds., pp. 51-58, Singapore: World Scientific, 1997.
[11] F. Mokhtarian and A.K. Mackworth, “A Theory of Multiscale, Curvature-Based Shape Representation for Planar Curves,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 789-805, Aug. 1992.
[12] S. Sclaroff, “Deformable Prototypes for Encoding Shape Categories in Image Databases,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 30, pp. 627-641, 1997.
[13] K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. Dickinson, and S. Zucker, Shock Graphs and Shape Matching Int'l J. Computer Vision, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13-32, Nov. 1999.
[14] K. Siddiqi, K.J. Tresness, and B.B. Kimia, “Parts of Visual Form: Psychophysical Aspects,” Perception, vol. 25, pp. 399-424, 1996.

Index Terms:
Shape representation, shape similarity measure, visual parts, discrete curve evolution.
Longin Jan Latecki, Rolf Lakämper, "Shape Similarity Measure Based on Correspondence of Visual Parts," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1185-1190, Oct. 2000, doi:10.1109/34.879802
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.