CSDL Home IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 1999 vol.21 Issue No.04 - April
Issue No.04 - April (1999 vol.21)
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/34.761261
<p><b>Abstract</b>—In this paper, we review most major filtering approaches to texture feature extraction and perform a comparative study. Filtering approaches included are Laws masks, ring/wedge filters, dyadic Gabor filter banks, wavelet transforms, wavelet packets and wavelet frames, quadrature mirror filters, discrete cosine transform, eigenfilters, optimized Gabor filters, linear predictors, and optimized finite impulse response filters. The features are computed as the local energy of the filter responses. The effect of the filtering is highlighted, keeping the local energy function and the classification algorithm identical for most approaches. For reference, comparisons with two classical nonfiltering approaches, co-occurrence (statistical) and autoregressive (model based) features, are given. We present a ranking of the tested approaches based on extensive experiments.</p>
Texture classification, image processing, filtering, survey.
Trygve Randen, "Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study", IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, vol.21, no. 4, pp. 291-310, April 1999, doi:10.1109/34.761261