This Article 
 Bibliographic References 
 Add to: 
From Uncertainty to Visual Exploration
October 1991 (vol. 13 no. 10)
pp. 1038-1049

The authors attempt to determine what can be inferred from ambiguity in processes of visual interpretation. They discuss this question in a specific context: the interpretation of scene geometry in the form of parametrized volumetric models. Ambiguity is described as a local probabilistic property of the misfit error surface in the parameter space of superellipsoid models, namely, as an ellipsoid of confidence in which there is a given probability that the true parameters can be found. The authors show how to project the ellipsoid of confidence back into 3D space to obtain the shell in which the true 3D surface most probably lies and introduce what they call the uncertainty as a local property of the fitted model's surface. They propose a technique that can use this information to plan a new direction of view that minimizes the ambiguity of subsequent interpretation.

[1] P. K. Allen and P. Michelman, "Acquisition and interpretation of 3-D sensor data from touch", inProc. Workshop Interpretation 3D Scenes, Nov. 1989, pp. 32-38.
[2] A. H. Barr, "Superquadrics and angle preserving transformations,"IEEE Comput. Graphics Applications, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-23, Jan. 1981.
[3] Computer Society of the IEEE,Proceedings: Workshop on Interpretation of 3D Scenes.New York: IEEE Comput. Soc. Nov. 1989.
[4] F. Ferrie, J. Lagarde, and P. Whaite, "Darboux frames, snakes, and super-quadrics: Geometry from the bottom-up," inProc. Workshop Interpretation 3D Scenes, 1989, pp. 170-176.
[5] F. Ferrie, J. Lagarde, and P. Whaite, "Recovery of volumetric descriptions from laser rangefinder images." inComput. Vision-ECCV 90(Antibes, France), Apr. 1990, pp. 23-27.
[6] A. D. Gross and T. E. Boult, "Error of fit measures for recovering parametric solids," inProc. 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. vision, Dec. 1988, pp. 690-694.
[7] D.G. Luenberger,Linear and Nonlinear Programming.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984.
[8] D. Marr, Vision. New York: Freeman, 1982.
[9] A. M. Mood and F. A. Graybill,Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
[10] A. P. Pentland, "Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form,"Artificial Intell., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 293-331, 1986.
[11] A. Pentland, "Recognition by parts," inProc. 1st Int. Conf. Comput. Vision(London, UK), June 1987, pp. 612-620.
[12] W. Press, B. Flannery, S. Teukolsky, and W. Vetterling,Numeric Recipes in C-The Art of Scientific Computing.Cambridge, UR: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[13] F. Solina and R. Bajcsy, "Range image interpretation of mail pieces with superquadrics,"Vision, pp. 733-737, 1988.
[14] F. Solina and R. Bajcsy, "Recovery of parametric models from range images: The case for superquadrics with global deformations,"IEEE Trans. Patt. Analysis Machine Intell.vol. 12, pp. 131-147, Feb. 1990.

Index Terms:
superellipsoid models parameter space; uncertainty; visual exploration; ambiguity; visual interpretation; scene geometry; parametrized volumetric models; misfit error surface; pattern recognition; picture processing
P. Whaite, F.P. Ferrie, "From Uncertainty to Visual Exploration," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1038-1049, Oct. 1991, doi:10.1109/34.99237
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.