This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Measurement-Based Bandwidth Scavenging in Wireless Networks
January 2012 (vol. 11 no. 1)
pp. 19-32
Anthony Plummer Jr., Michigan State University, East Lansing
Mahmoud Taghizadeh, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Subir Biswas, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Dynamic Spectrum Access can enable a secondary user in a cognitive network to access unused spectrum, or whitespace, found between primary user transmissions in a wireless network. The key design objective for a secondary user access strategy is to "scavenge” the maximum amount of spatio-temporally fragmented whitespace while limiting the amount of disruption caused to the primary users. In this paper, we first measure and analyze the whitespace profiles of an 802.11 network (using ns-2 simulation) and a non-802.11 (CSMA)-based network (developed on TelosB Motes). Then we propose two novel secondary user access strategies, which are based on measurement and statistical modeling of the whitespace as perceived by the secondary users. Afterward, we perform simulation experiments to validate the effectiveness of the proposed access strategies under single and multiple secondary user scenarios, and evaluate their performance numerically using the developed analytical expressions. The results show that the proposed access strategies are able to consistently scavenge between 90 and 96 percent of the available whitespace capacity, while keeping the primary users disruption less than 5 percent.

[1] V.R. Petty et al., “Feasibility of Dynamic Spectrum Access in Underutilized Television Bands,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Acess Networks (DySPAN '07), Apr. 2007.
[2] S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, and B.M. Sadler, “Dynamic Spectrum Access in WLAN Channels: Empirical Model and Its Stochastic Analysis,” Proc. First Int'l Workshop Technology and Policy for Accessing Spectrum (TAPAS '06), 2006.
[3] N. Golmie, N. Chevrollier, and O. Rebala, “Bluetooth and WLAN Coexistence: Challenges and Solutions,” IEEE Wireless Comm., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 22-29, Dec. 2003.
[4] S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, and B.M. Sadler, “Cognitive Medium Access: Constraining Interference Based on Experimental Models,” IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95-105, Jan. 2008.
[5] C.F. Chiasserini and R.R. Rao, “Coexistence Mechanisms for Interference Mitigation between IEEE 802.11 WLANs and Bluetooth,” Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.
[6] D. Niyato and E. Hossain, “Cognitive Radio for Next-Generation Wireless Networks: An Approach to Opportunistic Channel Selection in IEEE 802.11-Based Wireless Mesh,” IEEE Wireless Comm., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46-54, Feb. 2009.
[7] A. Tuan Hoang, D. Tung, C. Wong, and Y. Liang, “Design and Analysis for an 802.11-Based Cognitive Radio Network,” Proc. IEEE Wireless Comm. and Networking Conf. (WCNC '09), 2009.
[8] S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, and B.M. Sadler, “A Measurement-Based Model for Dynamic Spectrum Access in WLAN Channels,” Proc. IEEE Military Comm. Conf. (MILCOM '06), 2006.
[9] S. Huang, X. Liu, and Z. Ding, “Optimal Transmission Strategies for Dynamic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1636-1648, Dec. 2009.
[10] B. Wang, Z. Ji, and K.J. Ray Liu, “Primary-Prioritized Markov Approach for Dynamic Spectrum Access,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN '07), 2007.
[11] S. Huang, X. Liu, and Z. Ding, “On Optimal Sensing and Transmission Strategies for Dynamic Spectrum Access,” Proc. IEEE Third Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN '08), 2008.
[12] Y. Chen, Q. Zhao, and A. Swami, “Joint Design and Separation Principle for Opportunistic Spectrum Access in the Presence of Sensing Errors,” IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2053-2071, May 2008.
[13] H. Kim and K.G. Shin, “Fast Discovery of Spectrum Opportunities in Cognitive Radio Networks,” Proc. IEEE Third Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Acess Networks (DySPAN '08), Oct. 2008.
[14] S. Huang, X. Liu, and Z. Ding, “Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks,” Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2008.
[15] IEEE 802.11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications, IEEE, http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download 802.11-2007.pdf, 2011.
[16] A.M.R. Slingerland, P. Pawelczak, R.V. Prasad, A. Lo, and R. Hekmat, “Performance of Transport Control Protocol over Dynamic Spectrum Access Links,” Proc. IEEE Second Int'l Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Acess Networks (DySPAN '07), 2007.
[17] P. Toth, “Dynamic Programming Algorithms for the Zero-One Knapsack Problem,” Computing, vol. 25, pp. 29-45, 1980.
[18] MAXIM, “2.4GHz 802.11b Zero-IF Transceivers,” http://pdfserv. maxim-ic.com/en/dsMAX2820-MAX2821.pdf , 2011.
[19] Intersil, “Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum Baseband Processor,” http://www.datasheetarchive.com/datasheet-pdf/ 012DSA00211974.html, 2011.
[20] CrossBow, “TelosB Mote Platform,” http://www.xbow.com/pdfTelos_PR.pdf, 2011.
[21] Stanford Univ., “Sourceforge.net Repository,” http://tinyos.cvs. sourceforge.net/viewvc/ tinyos/tinyos-2.x-contrib/stanford-sing/ appsRssiSample, 2011.

Index Terms:
Dynamic capacity scavenging, cognitive networks, secondary user access strategy, whitespace modeling.
Citation:
Anthony Plummer Jr., Mahmoud Taghizadeh, Subir Biswas, "Measurement-Based Bandwidth Scavenging in Wireless Networks," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19-32, Jan. 2012, doi:10.1109/TMC.2010.267
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.