The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - May (2008 vol.7)
pp: 661-672
ABSTRACT
We propose several localized sensor area coverage protocols for heterogeneous sensors, each with arbitrary sensing and transmission radii. Sensors are assumed to be time synchronized, and active sensors are determined at the beginning of each round. The approach has a very small communication overhead since prior knowledge about neighbor existence is not required. Each node selects a random timeout and listens to messages sent by other nodes before the timeout expires. Sensor nodes whose sensing area is not fully covered (or fully covered but with a disconnected set of active sensors) when the deadline expires decide to remain active for the considered round, and transmit an activity message announcing it. There are four variants in our approach, depending on whether or not withdrawal and retreat messages are transmitted. Covered nodes decide to sleep, with or without transmitting withdrawal message to inform neighbors about the status. After hearing from more neighbors, active sensors may observe that they became covered, and may decide to alter their original decision and transmit a retreat message. Our simulation shows reduced message overhead while preserving coverage quality compared to existing method based on hello messages followed by retreat ones.
INDEX TERMS
Distributed networks, Wireless communication, Algorithm/protocol design and analysis
CITATION
Jean Carle, David Simplot-Ryl, Antoine Gallais, "Localized Sensor Area Coverage with Low Communication Overhead", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.7, no. 5, pp. 661-672, May 2008, doi:10.1109/TMC.2007.70793
REFERENCES
[1] J. Bachrach and C. Taylor, “Localization in Sensor Networks,” Handbook of Sensor Networks, I. Stojmenovic, ed., JohnWiley & Sons, pp. 277-310, 2005.
[2] J. Carle, A. Gallais, and D. Simplot-Ryl, “Preserving Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks by Using Surface Coverage Relay Dominating Sets,” Proc. 10th IEEE Symp. Computers and Comm. (ISCC), 2005.
[3] B. Carbunar, A. Grama, J. Vitek, and O. Carbunar, “Coverage Preserving Redundancy Elimination in Sensor Networks,” Proc. First Ann. IEEE Conf. Sensor and Ad Hoc Comm. and Networks (SECON), 2004.
[4] Y. Cai, M. Li, W. Shu, and M.-Y. Wu, “ACOS: A Precise Energy-Aware Coverage Control Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77-98, 2007.
[5] A. Gallais and J. Carle, “An Adaptive Localized Algorithm for Multiple Sensor Area Coverage,” Proc. IEEE 21st Int'l Conf. Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 2007.
[6] A. Gallais, J. Carle, D. Simplot-Ryl, and I. Stojmenovic, “Ensuring K-Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks under Realistic Physical Layer Assumptions,” Proc. Fifth IEEE Conf. Sensors (Sensors), 2006.
[7] A. Gallais, J. Carle, D. Simplot-Ryl, and I. Stojmenovic, “Localized Sensor Area Coverage with Low Communication Overhead,” Proc. Fourth IEEE Int'l Conf. Pervasive Computing and Comm. (PerCom), 2006.
[8] H. Gupta, S. Das, and Q. Gu, “Connected Sensor Cover: Self-Organization of Sensor Networks for Efficient Query Execution,” Proc. ACM MobiHoc, 2003.
[9] C. Gui and P. Mohapatra, “Power Conservation and Quality of Surveillance in Target Tracking Sensor Networks,” Proc. ACM MobiCom, 2004.
[10] C.-F. Hsin and M. Liu, “Network Coverage Using Low Duty-Cycled Sensors: Random & Coordinated Sleep Algorithms,” Proc. Third Int'l Symp. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2004.
[11] C.-F. Huang and Y.-C. Tseng, “The Coverage Problem in a Wireless Sensor Network,” Proc. Second ACM Int'l Conf. Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), 2003.
[12] J. Jiang and W. Dou, “A Coverage Preserving Density Control Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. Third Int'l Conf. Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless (ADHOC-NOW), 2004.
[13] J. Kuruvila, A. Nayak, and I. Stojmenović, “Hop Count Optimal Position Based Packet Routing Algorithms for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks with a Realistic Physical Layer,” Proc. First IEEE Int'l Conf. Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), 2004.
[14] L. Quin and T. Kunz, “On-Demand Routing in Manets: The Impact of a Realistic Physical Layer Model,” Proc. Second Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless (ADHOC-NOW), 2003.
[15] K. Romer, P. Blum, and L. Meier, “Time Synchronization and Calibration in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Handbook of Sensor Networks, I. Stojmenović, ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 199-238, 2005.
[16] D. Simplot-Ryl, I. Stojmenović, and J. Wu, “Energy-Efficient Backbone Construction, Broadcasting, and Area Coverage in Sensor Networks,” Handbook of Sensor Networks, I.Stojmenović,ed., JohnWiley & Sons, pp. 343-380, 2005.
[17] J.P. Sheu, C.H. Yu, and S.C. Tu, “A Distributed Protocol for Query Execution in Sensor Networks,” Proc. IEEE Wireless Comm. and Networking Conf. (WCNC), 2005.
[18] D. Tian and N. Georganas, “A Coverage-Preserving Node Scheduling Scheme for Large Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. First ACM Int'l Conf. Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA '02), pp. 32-41, 2002.
[19] G. Xing, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Lu, R. Pless, and C. Gill, “Integrated Coverage and Connectivity Configuration for Energy Conservation in Sensor Networks,” ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36-72, 2005.
[20] T. Yan, T. He, and J.A. Stankovic, “Differentiated Surveillance Service for Sensor Networks,” Proc. ACM Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2003.
[21] F. Ye, G. Zhong, J. Cheng, S. Lu, and L. Zhang, “PEAS: A Robust Energy Conserving Protocol for Long-Lived Sensor Networks,” Proc. 23rd Int'l Conf. Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2003.
[22] H. Zhang and J.C. Hou, “Maintaining Sensing Coverage and Connectivity in Large Sensor Networks,” Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, vol. 1, pp. 89-123, 2005.
22 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool