The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - May (2008 vol.7)
pp: 570-584
ABSTRACT
Location awareness is an important service in ubiquitous computing environments. This paper presents Lightning Protocol, a hard real-time, fast, and lightweight protocol to elect the sensor closest to an impulsive sound source, for the purpose of either proximity-based localization or leader election for sensor collaboration. This protocol utilizes the fact that electromagnetic wave propagates much faster than acoustic wave to efficiently reduce the number of contending sensors in the election process. With only simple RF bursts, most basic comparison operations, no need of clock synchronization, and a memory footprint as small as 5330 bytes of ROM and 187 bytes of RAM, the protocol incurs $O(1)$ transmissions irrespective of the sensor density and guarantees hard real-time ($O(1)$) time delay in localization. Experiment results using UC Berkeley Motes in a common office environment demonstrate that the time delay for Lightning Protocol is in the order of milliseconds. The simplicity of the protocol reduces memory cost, computation complexity, and programming difficulty, making it especially desirable for low-end wireless sensors.
INDEX TERMS
Wireless sensor networks, Real time, Location-dependent and sensitive, Pervasive computing
CITATION
Qixin Wang, Rong Zheng, Ajay Tirumala, Xue Liu, Lui Sha, "Lightning: A Hard Real-Time, Fast, and Lightweight Low-End Wireless Sensor Election Protocol for Acoustic Event Localization", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.7, no. 5, pp. 570-584, May 2008, doi:10.1109/TMC.2007.70752
REFERENCES
[1] X. Sheng et al., “Energy-Based Acoustic Source Localization,” Proc. Second Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '03), pp. 285-300, 2003.
[2] Q. Wang et al., “Acoustic Target Tracking Using Tiny Wireless Sensor Devices,” Proc. Second Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '03), pp. 642-657, 2003.
[3] Q. Wang, Applying Lightning Protocol to Gunshot Localization, http://www-rtsl.cs.uiuc.edu/paperstechnicalreports.html , 2007.
[4] Mica2 Wireless Measurement System Datasheet, http://www.xbow. com/Products/Product_pdf_files/ Wireless_pdf6020-0042-04_A_MICA2.pdf , Aug. 2003.
[5] TinyOS: A Component-Based OS for the Networked Sensor Regime, http://webs.cs.berkeley.edutos/, 2004.
[6] RFM TR1000 916.50MHz Hybrid Tansceiver, http://today.cs. berkeley.edu/tos/hardware/ design/data_sheetsRFM.pdf, 2004.
[7] F. Cali et al., “Dynamic Tuning of the IEEE 802.11 Protocol to Achieve a Theoretical Throughput Limit,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 785-799, Dec. 2000.
[8] Lightning Protocol Demo, http://www-rtsl.cs.uiuc.edu/papersLightningDemo.html , Apr. 2004.
[9] T.S. Rappaport, Wireless Comm. Principles and Practice, second ed. Prentice Hall, 2004.
[10] X. Sheng et al., “Distributed Particle Filter with GMM Approximation for Multiple Targets Localization and Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network,” Proc. Fourth Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '05), pp. 181-188, Apr. 2005.
[11] J. Aslam et al., “Tracking a Moving Object with a Binary Sensor Network,” Proc. First ACM Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '03), pp. 150-161, 2003.
[12] W. Kim et al., “On Target Tracking with Binary Proximity Sensors,” Proc. Fourth Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '05), pp. 301-308, Apr. 2005.
[13] G. Simon et al., “Sensor Network-Based Countersniper System,” Proc. Second ACM Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '04), pp. 1-12, 2004.
[14] T. He et al., “VigilNet: An Integrated Sensor Network System for Energy-Efficient Surveillance,” ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-38, 2006.
[15] A. Arora et al., “ExScal: Elements of an Extreme Scale Wireless Sensor Network,” Proc. 11th IEEE Int'l Conf. Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 102-108, 2005.
[16] S. Bapat et al., “Analyzing the Yield of ExScal: A Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Network Experiment,” Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. Network Protocols (ICNP '05), pp. 53-62, 2005.
[17] J. Liu et al., “Distributed Group Management for Track Initiation and Maintenance in Target Localization Applications,” Proc. Second Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '03), pp. 113-128, 2003.
[18] B. Blum et al., “An Entity Maintenance and Connection Service for Sensor Networks,” Proc. ACM MobiSys, 2003.
[19] W.-P. Chen et al., “Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 258-271, July-Sept. 2004.
[20] S. Oh et al., “Tracking on a Graph,” Proc. Fourth Int'l Workshop Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '05), pp. 195-202, Apr. 2005.
[21] W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 493-506, 2004.
[22] I. Rhee et al., “Z-MAC: A Hybrid MAC for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proc. Third ACM Int'l Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '05), pp. 90-101, Nov. 2005.
[23] J. Elson et al., “Fine-Grained Network Time Synchronization Using Reference Broadcasts,” Proc. Fifth Symp. Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI '02), pp. 147-163, Dec. 2002.
[24] Q. Wang et al., “Lightning: A Fast and Lightweight Acoustic Localization Protocol Using Low-End Wireless Micro-Sensors,” Proc. 25th IEEE Int'l Real-Time Systems Symp. (RTSS '04), pp. 371-381, Dec. 2004.
23 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool