The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - March (2008 vol.7)
pp: 372-384
ABSTRACT
In multihop wireless networks, the variability of channels results in some paths providing better performance than other paths. While it is well known that some paths are better than others, a significant number of routing protocols do not focus on utilizing optimal paths. However, cooperative diversity, an area of recent interest, provides techniques to efficiently exploit path and channel diversity. This paper examines the potential performance improvements offered by path diversity. Three settings are examined, namely, where the path loss and channel correlation are neglected, where path loss is considered, but channel correlation is neglected, and where path loss and channel correlation are both accounted for. It is shown that by exploiting path diversity, dramatic improvements in the performance may be achieved. Furthermore, in some settings, if the link statistics are held constant, then when path diversity is exploited, the performance improves with path length. This implies that if sufficient path diversity exists, then paths with more hops tend to support higher bit-rates than paths with fewer hops. It is shown that such behavior occurs when a particular map has a non-zero fixed point.
INDEX TERMS
Wireless communication, Routing protocols, Network communications
CITATION
Stephan Bohacek, "Performance Improvements Provided by Route Diversity in Multihop Wireless Networks", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol.7, no. 3, pp. 372-384, March 2008, doi:10.1109/TMC.2007.70742
REFERENCES
[1] S.-J. Lee and M. Gerla, “Split Multipath Routing with Maximally Disjoint Paths in Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Comm. (ICC '01), 2001.
[2] J. Kim and S. Bohacek, “Selection Metrics for Multihop Cooperative Relaying,” Proc. Fourth Ann. Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MedHoc '05), 2005.
[3] S. Bohacek, R. Blum, L. Cimini, L. Greenstein, and A. Haimovich, “The Impact of the Timeliness of Information on the Performance of Multihop Best-Select,” Proc. Military Comm. Conf. (MILCOM '05), 2005.
[4] P. Sambasivam, A. Murthy, and E.M. Belding-Royer, “Dynamically Adaptive Multipath Routing Based on AODV,” Proc. Third Ann. Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MedHocNet '04), 2004.
[5] M.K. Marina and S.R. Das, “Ad Hoc On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing,” technical report, State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook, 2003.
[6] A. Nasipuri and S.R. Das, “On-Demand Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Comm. and Networks (ICCCN '99), pp. 64-70, 1999.
[7] S.-J. Lee and M. Gerla, “AODV-BR: Backup Routing in Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Wireless Comm. and Networking Conf. (WCNC '00), pp. 1311-1316, 2000.
[8] L. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Y. Shu, L. Wang, and O.W. Yang, “Load Balancing of Multipath Source Routing in Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Comm. (ICC '02), 2002.
[9] S. Vutukury and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “MDVA: A Distance-Vector Multipath Routing Protocol,” Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.
[10] L. Wang, “Multipath Source Routing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. Canadian Conf. Electrical and Computer Eng. (CCECE '00), pp. 479-483, 2000.
[11] A. Tsirigos and Z.J. Hass, “Multipath Routing in the Presence of Frequent Topological Changes,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, pp. 132-138, 2001.
[12] J.R. Barry, E.A. Lee, and D.G. Messerschmitt, Digital Communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
[13] A. Sendonaris, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang, “User Cooperation Diversity—Part I: System Description,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 51, pp. 1927-1938, 2003.
[14] A. Sendonaris, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang, “User Cooperation Diversity—Part II: Implementation Aspects and Performance Analysis,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 51, pp. 1939-1948, 2003.
[15] J.L. Neman, D. Tse, and G. Wornell, “Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Efficient Protocols and Outage Behavior,” IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3062-3080, 2004.
[16] J.N. Laneman, G.W. Wornell, and D.N.C. Tse, “An Efficient Protocol for Realizing Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. Information Theory (ISIT '01), p. 294, 2001.
[17] J. Luo, R.S. Blum, L.J. Greenstein, L.J. Cimini, and A.M. Haimovich, “New Approaches for Cooperative Use of Multiple Antennas in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” Proc. 60th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC '04—Fall), 2004.
[18] B. Zhao and M.C. Valenti, “Practical Relay Networks: A Generalization of Hybrid-ARQ,” IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 23, pp. 7-18, 2005.
[19] J. Boyer, D.D. Falconer, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Multihop Diversity in Wireless Relaying Channels,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1963-1968, 2004.
[20] DLink, 7100AP Product Specifications, http:/www.dlink.com, 2007.
[21] H. Karl and A. Willig, Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks. Wiley, 2005.
[22] T. Rappaport, Wireless Communication. Pearson Education, 2002.
[23] R. Vijayan and J.M. Holtzman, “Foundations for Level Crossing Analysis of Handoff Algorithms,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Comm. (ICC '93), 1993.
[24] F. Graziosi and F. Santucci, “A General Correlation Model for Shadow Fading in Mobile Radio Systems,” IEEE Comm. Letters, vol. 3, pp. 102-104, 2002.
[25] M. Haenggi and D. Puccinelli, “Routing in Ad Hoc Networks: A Case for Long Hops,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, vol. 43, pp. 93-101, 2005.
[26] C. Robinson, Dynamical Systems. CRC Press, 1995.
[27] G. Grimmett, Percolation. Springer, 1999.
[28] R.H. Clarke, “A Statistical Theory of Mobile-Radio Reception,” Bell Systems Technical J., vol. 47, pp. 957-1000, 1968.
[29] M. Gudmundson, “Correlation Model for Shadow Fading in Mobile Radio Systems,” Electronics Letters, vol. 27, 1991.
[30] S.R. Finch, Mathematical Constants. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
[31] M.R. Leadbetter, G. Lindgren, and H. Rootzen, Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes. Springer-Verlag, 1983.
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool