This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Production Systems with Negation as Failure
March/April 2002 (vol. 14 no. 2)
pp. 336-352

We study action rule-based systems with two forms of negation, namely classical negation and “negation as failure to find a course of actions.” We show by several examples that adding negation as failure to such systems increases their expressiveness in the sense that real life problems can be represented in a natural and simple way. Then, we address the problem of providing a formal declarative semantics to these extended systems by adopting an argumentation-based approach which has been shown to be a simple unifying framework for understanding the declarative semantics of various nonmonotonic formalisms. In this way, we naturally define the grounded (well-founded), stable, and preferred semantics for production systems with negation as failure. Next, we characterize the class of stratified production systems, which enjoy the properties that the above mentioned semantics coincide and that negation as failure to find a course of actions can be computed by a simple bottom-up operator. Stratified production systems can be implemented on top of conventional production systems in two ways. The first way corresponds to the understanding of stratification as a form of priority assignment between rules. We show that this implementation, though sound, is not complete in the general case. Hence, we propose a second implementation by means of an algorithm which transforms a finite stratified production system into a classical one. This is a sound and complete implementation, though computationally hard, as shown in the paper.

[1] S. Abiteboul and V. Vianu, “Non-Determinism in Logic-Based Languages,” Ann. Math. and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 151-186, 1991.
[2] A. Aiken, J.M. Hellerstein, and J. Widom, “Static Analysis Techniques for Predicting the Behavior of Active Database Rules,” ACM Trans. Database Systems (ACM TODS), vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3-41, 1995.
[3] K. Apt, H.A. Blair, and A. Walker, "Towards a Theory of Declarative Knowledge," Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, J. Minker, ed., pp. 89-148. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
[4] A. Bondarenko, P.M. Dung, R.A. Kowalski, and F. Toni, “An Abstract, Argumentation-Based Theoretic Approach to Default Reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 93, nos. 1-2, pp. 63-101, 1997.
[5] G. Brewka and T. Eiter, “Preferred Answer Sets for Extended Logic Programs,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 297-356, 1999.
[6] J. Widom, S. Ceri, and U. Dayal, Active Database Systems: Triggers and Rules for Advanced Database Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.
[7] P.M. Dung, “Negation as Hypotheses: An Abductive Foundation for Logic Programming,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Logic Programming, Koichi Furukawa, ed., pp. 3-17, 1991.
[8] P.M. Dung, “The Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Logic Programming, Nonmonotonic Reasoning and N-Person Games,” Artifical Intelligence, vol. 77, no. 2, 1995.
[9] P.M. Dung and P. Mancarella, “Production Systems Need Negation as Failure,” Proc. Am. Assoc. for Artifical Intelligence, (AAAI 96), pp.1242-1247, 1996.
[10] P.M. Dung and T.C. Son, “Default Reasoning with Specificity,“ Proc. First Int'l Conf. Computational Logic, 2000.
[11] U. Dayal, E.N. Hanson, and J. Widom, “Active Database Systems,” Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond, W. Kim, ed., pp. 434-456, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
[12] C.L. Forgy, “OPS 5 User's Manual,” Technical Report CMU-CS-81-135, Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1981.
[13] C. Froidevaux, “Default Logic for Action Rule-Based Systems” Proc. 10th European Conf. Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 92), B. Neumann, ed., pp. 413-417, 1992.
[14] H. Geffner and J. Pearl, “Conditional Entailment: Bridging Two Approaches to Default Reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 2-3, pp. 109-244, 1992.
[15] M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz, “The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming,” Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. Logic Programming, R.A. Kowalski and K.A. Bowen, eds., pp. 1070-1080, 1988
[16] E.N. Hanson and J. Widom, “An Overview of Production Rules in Database Systems,” Knowledge Eng. Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 21-143, 1993.
[17] F. Hayes-Roth, "Rule Based Systems," Comm. ACM, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 921-932, 1985.
[18] A.C. Kakas and F. Toni, “Computing Argumentation in Logic Programming,” J. Logic and Computation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 515-562, 1999.
[19] D. McDermott and J. Doyle, “Non-Monotonic Logic I,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, nos. 1-2, pp. 41-72, 1980.
[20] R.C. Moore, "Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 25, pp. 75-94, 1985.
[21] J.L. Pollock, “Defeasible Reasoning,” Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 481-518, 1987.
[22] H. Prakken and G. Sartor, “A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities,” Artificial Intelligence Today, M. Wooldridge and M.M. Veloso, eds., pp. 365-379, 1999.
[23] H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk, “Logical Systems for Defeasible Argumentation,” Handbook of Philosophical Logic. D. Gabbay, ed., second ed., Kluwer Academic, 2000.
[24] L. Raschid, “A Semantics for a Class of Stratified Production System Programs,” J. Logic Programming, 1994.
[25] R. Reiter, “A Logic for Default Reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 81-132, 1980.
[26] G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui, “A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and Its Implementation,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 2-3, pp. 125-157, 1992.
[27] A. van Gelder, K. Ross, and J. Schlipf, "Unfounded Sets and Well-founded Semantics for General Logic Programs," Proc. Symp. Principles of Database Systems, pp. 221-230, 1988.
[28] G. Vreeswijk, “The Feasibility of Defeat in Defeasible Reasoning,” Proc. Second Int'l Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR '91), J.F. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, eds., pp. 526-534, 1991.
[29] C. Zaniolo, “Active Database Rules with Transaction-Conscious Stable-Model Semantics” Proc. Fourth Int'l Conf. Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, (DOOD '95), pp. 55-72, 1995.

Index Terms:
rule-based systems, knowledge-based systems, rule-based processing, expert systems, knowledge representation
Citation:
P.M. Dung, P. Mancarella, "Production Systems with Negation as Failure," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 336-352, March-April 2002, doi:10.1109/69.991720
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.