This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Automating Knowledge Acquisition: A Propositional Approach to Representing Expertise as an Alternative to Repertory Grid Technique
February 1995 (vol. 7 no. 1)
pp. 53-67

Abstract—Repertory grid technique plays a central role in the elicitation methodology of many well-reported knowledge acquisition tools or workbenches. However, the dependability of these systems is low where the technique breaks down or proves inadequate due to limited expressive power and other problems. This paper introduces an alternate approach based on Personal Construct Theory that elicits an expert’s knowledge as a network of terms that constitutes a propositional formalism. An extended example is used to both highlight the difficulties encountered using repertory grids and illustrate how these are overcome using the proposed approach. The results of an empirical study are presented where an experienced clinician compared the knowledge structures that she constructed for a diagnostic task using each elicitation technique. Furthermore, although the network representation is amenable to inductive learning methods for generating production rules, an inference method is demonstrated which reveals the formalism’s categorical reasoning potential. The authors conclude it is more appropriate to classify such methods as either mediating or immediate rather than the knowledge structures they employ. The paper contributes to a better understanding of constructivist formalisms developed for knowledge acquisition.

[1] J. Boose,Expertise Transfer for Expert System Design, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1986.
[2] B.R. Gaines and M.L. Shaw,“Eliciting knowledge and transferring iteffectively to a knowledge-based system,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., Vol. 5, No. 1, Feb. 1993, pp. 4-14.
[3] G. Kelly,“A brief introduction to personal construct theory,” in D. Bannister, ed., Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory, Academic Press, London, 1970.
[4] L. Thomas and E. Harri-Augstein,Self-Organized Learning: Foundations of a Conversational Science for Psychology, Routledge Keegan Paul, London, 1985.
[5] R. Todd,“Self-organized learning within an intelligent teaching system,” in J. Self, ed., Intelligent and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction, Chapman and Hall, London, 1988.
[6] J. Bradshaw and J. Boose,“Combining information and preferences usingAQUINAS and AXOTL,” Int’l J. Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 32, 1990, pp. 121-186.
[7] C. Eden and S. Jones,“Using repertory grids for problem construction,” J. Operational Research Soc., Vol. 35, No. 9, 1984, pp. 779-790.
[8] M.L. Shaw,Recent Advances in Personal Construct Technology, Academic Press, London, 1981.
[9] K. Ford,F. Perty,J. Adams-Webber,, and P. Chang,“An approach to knowledge acquisition based on the structure of personal construct systems,” IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., Vol. 4, No. 1, 1991, pp. 78-88.
[10] J.H. Boose and J.M. Bradshaw, "Expertise Transfer and Complex Problems: Using Aquinas as a Knowledge Acquisition Workbench for Knowledge-Based Systems," Int'l J. Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1987, pp. 3-28.
[11] J. Diederich and M. Linster,“Knowledge-based knowledge elicitation,” in G. Guida and C. Tasso, eds., Topics in Expert System Design: Methodologies andTools, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1987.
[12] M.L. Shaw and B.R. Gaines,“KITTEN: Knowledge initiation and transfer toolsfor experts and novices,” Int’l J. Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 27, 1987, pp. 251-280.
[13] G. Rugg and N. Shadbolt,“On the limitations of repertory grids inknowledge acquisition,” Proc. 1991 Banff Knowledge Acquisition Workshop.
[14] B.R. Gaines and M.L. Shaw,“New directions in the analysis and interactiveelicitation of personal construct systems,” in M.L. Shaw, ed., Recent Advances in Personal Construct Technology, Academic Press, London, 1981.
[15] J. Boose,“A grid tool for eliciting expert knowledge,” in J. Mancuso and M.L. Shaw, eds., Cognition and Personal Structure: Computer Access and Analysis, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1988.
[16] D. Bannister and F. Fransella,Inquiring Man: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Croom Helm, London, 1986.
[17] D. Batty,A Constructivist Propositional Logic for Automated KnowledgeAcquisition, masters thesis, Dept. of Systems Design Eng., Univ. of Waterloo, 1992.
[18] J.P. Anton,Aristotle’s Theory of Contrariety, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957.
[19] N. Johnson,“Mediating representations in knowledge elicitation,” in D. Diaper, ed., Knowledge Elicitation: Principles, Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, 1989.
[20] K. Ford,“A constructivist view of the frame problem in artificial intelligence,” Canadian Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1989, pp. 181-90.

Index Terms:
Associative network, constructivist term logic, knowledge elicitation, Personal Construct Theory, repertory grid.
Citation:
Derek Batty, Mohamed S. Kamel, "Automating Knowledge Acquisition: A Propositional Approach to Representing Expertise as an Alternative to Repertory Grid Technique," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53-67, Feb. 1995, doi:10.1109/69.368518
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.