This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
An Approach to Knowledge Acquisition Based on the Structure of Personal Construct Systems
March 1991 (vol. 3 no. 1)
pp. 78-88

A research effort aimed at the development and unification of the prerequisite underlying theoretical foundations for an adequate approach to knowledge elicitation from repertory grid data is described. A theory of confirmation that incorporates the basic tenets of personal construct psychology directly into the logic as a basis for the determination of relevance is offered, thus strengthening the logic and extending personal construct psychology. These largely theoretical developments are applied to the representation and analysis of repertory grid data. The concept of an alpha -plane is introduced as a binary decomposition of repertory grid data that furnishes the realization of construct extensions (or ranges of convenience) needed to determine the range of relevance of a particular generalization or hypothesis. In addition, they provide the uniquely determined string of incidences required by any application of Bundy's truth functional incidence calculus. The theories are applied to the design and construction of NICOD-a semiautomated medical knowledge acquisition system. The system has been successfully employed in the elicitation of valuable heuristic radiological knowledge (mammography) that the domain experts (radiologists) were otherwise unable to articulate.

[1] E. A. Feigenbaum, "The art of artificial intelligence 1: Themes and case studies of knowledge engineering," Rep. STAN-CS-77-621. Stanford Univ., CA, 1977.
[2] H. L. Dreyfus and S.E. Dreyfus,Mind over Machine. New York: Free Press, 1986.
[3] Plato,Euthyphro, Apology, Crito. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956.
[4] L. Bainbridge, "Verbal reports as evidence of the process operator's knowledge,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 11, pp. 411-436, 1979.
[5] P. E. Johnson, "What kind of expert should a system be?,"J. Medicine Philosophy, vol. 8, pp. 77-97, 1983.
[6] D. A. Waterman,A Guide to Expert Systems. Reading, MA; Addison-Wesley, 1985.
[7] E. H. Shortliffe,Computer-based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. New York: Elsevier, 1976.
[8] J. H. Boose,Expertise Transfer for Expert System Design. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986.
[9] B.R. Gaines and M. L. G. Shaw, "New directions in the analysis and interactive elicitation of personal construct systems," inRecent Advances in Personal Construct Technology, M. L. G. Shaw, Ed. London, England: Academic, 1981, pp. 147-182.
[10] J. H. Boose, "Personal construct theory and the transfer of human expertise," inProc. AAAI-84. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann, 1984, pp. 27-33.
[11] J. H. Boose, "A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 23, pp. 495-525, 1985.
[12] P. J. Chang, K. M. Ford, and F. E. Petry, PA 31: "The production of expert system rules from repertory grid data based on a logic of confirmation," inProc. Seventh Int. Congress Personal Construct Psychology, Memphis, TN, 1987.
[13] R. R. Hoffman, "The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology,"AI Magazine, Summer 1987.
[14] K. M. Ford, "An approach to the automated acquisition of production rules from repertory grid data," Ph. D. dissertation, Dep. Comput. Sci., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA, 1987.
[15] K. M. Ford and J. R. Adams-Webber, "Knowledge acquisition and constructivist epistemology," inThe Psychology of Experts: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI, R. Hoffman, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
[16] G. A. Kelly,The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton, 1955.
[17] G. A. Kelly,Clinical Psychology and Personality: The Selected Papers of George Kelly, B.A. Maher, Ed. New York: Wiley, 1969.
[18] G. A. Kelly, "A brief introduction to personal construct theory," inPerspectives in Personal Construct Theory, D. Bannister, Ed. London, England: Academic, 1970, pp. 1-29.
[19] J. R. Adams-Webber, "Personal construct theory," inEncyclopedia of Psychology, R. Corsini, Ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1984, pp. 9-12.
[20] M. Husain, "Towhatcan one apply a construct?" inApplications of Personal Construct Theory, J. R. Adams-Webber and J. C. Mancuso, Eds. New York: Academic, 1983, pp. 11-28.
[21] J. R. Adams-Webber, "Actual structure and potential chaos: Relational aspects of progressive variations within a personal construct system," inPerspectives in Personal Construct Theory, D. Bannister, Ed. London, England: Academic, 1970, pp. 30-45.
[22] J. R. Adams-Webber, "Repertory grid technique," inConcise Encyclopedia of Psychology, R. Corsini, Ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1987, pp. 973-974.
[23] R. A. Neimeyer,The Development of Personal Construct Psychology. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1985.
[24] P. Slater,Dimensions of Intrapersonal Space, Vol. 2, P. Slater, Ed. London, England: Wiley, 1977.
[25] M. L. G. Shaw,On Becoming a Personal Scientist. London, England: Academic, 1980.
[26] M. L. G. Shaw, "PLANET: Some experience in creating an integrated system for repertory grid applications on a microcomputer,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 17, pp. 345-360, 1982.
[27] J. R. Adams-Webber and J. C. Mancuso, Eds.,Applications of Personal Construct Theory. New York: Academic, 1983.
[28] B. R. Gaines and M. L. G. Shaw, "New directions in the analysis and interactive elicitation of personal construct systems,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 13, pp. 81-116, 1980.
[29] J. R. Adams-Webber,Personal Construct Theory: Concepts and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1979.
[30] B. R. Gaines and M. L. G. Shaw, "Introduction of inference rules for expert systems,"Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 18, pp. 315-328, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986.
[31] J. H. Boose and J. M. Bradshaw, "Expertise transfer and complex problems: Using Aquinas as a knowledge-acquisition workbench for knowledge-based systems,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 26, pp. 3-28, 1987.
[32] M. L. G. Shaw and B. R. Gaines, "KITTEN: Knowledge initiation and transfer tools for experts and novices,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 27, pp. 251-280, 1987.
[33] R. Carnap,Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, IL: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962.
[34] C. G. Hempel, "Studies in the logic of confirmation," inAspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press, 1965, pp. 3-51.
[35] R. G. Swinburne,An Introduction to Confirmation Theory. London, England: Methuen, 1973.
[36] G. H. Von Wright, "The paradoxes of confirmation," inAspects of Inductive Logic, J. Hintikka and P. Suppes, Eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966, pp. 208-218.
[37] W. C. Salmon, "Confirmation,"Scientific Amer., vol. 228, pp. 75- 83, 1973.
[38] W.V. Quine,Methods of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1982.
[39] A. Bundy, "Incidence calculus: A mechanism for probabilistic reasoning,"J. Automated Reasoning, vol. 1, pp. 263-283, 1985.
[40] M. L. G. Shaw and B. R. Gaines, "An interactive knowledge elicitation technique using personal construct technology," inKnowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, A. L. Kidd, Ed. New York: Plenum, 1987, pp. 109-136.
[41] J. Nicod,Geometry and Induction. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press, 1970.
[42] P. K. Sen, "Approaches to the paradox of confirmation," inLogic, Induction and Ontology. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1982.
[43] E. O. Osgood, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum,The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: The Univ. of Illinois Press, 1957.
[44] S. Haack, "Do we need "fuzzy logic"?"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 11, pp. 437-445, 1979.
[45] E. H. Mamdani and J. Efstathiou, "An analysis of formal logics as inference mechanisms in expert systems,"Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 21, pp. 213-227, 1984.
[46] H. M. Hersh and A. Caramazza, "A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language,"J. Exper. Psychology: General, vol. 105, pp. 254-276, 1976.
[47] P. Schefe, "On foundations of reasoning with uncertain facts and vague concepts," inFuzzy Reasoning and its Applications. London, England: Academic, 1981, pp. 189-215.
[48] P. A. Hetherington, "Sureness measures and rating extremity in repertory grid technique: An exploratory study,"Int. J. Personal Construct Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 229-236, 1988.
[49] S. Tuhrim and J. Reggia, "Feasibility of physician-developed expert systems,"Medical Decision Making, vol. 6, pp. 23-26, 1986.
[50] K. M. Ford, "A constructivist view of the frame problem in artificial intelligence,"Canadian Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 188-190, 1989.
[51] N. M. Agnew and J. L. Brown, "Foundations for a model of knowing: I. Construing reality,"Canadian Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 152-167, 1989.
[52] J. A. Fodor,Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
[53] J. A. Fodor, "Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres," inThe Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial intelligence, Z. Pylyshyn, Ed. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987.
[54] Z. W. Pylyshyn, Ed.,Preface in The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987.

Index Terms:
knowledge representation; knowledge acquisition; structure; personal construct systems; unification; knowledge elicitation; repertory grid data; personal construct psychology; alpha -plane; binary decomposition; NICOD; semiautomated medical knowledge acquisition system; heuristic radiological knowledge; mammography; domain experts; radiologists; knowledge acquisition; medical administrative data processing
Citation:
K.M. Ford, F.E. Petry, J.R. Adams-Webber, P.J. Chang, "An Approach to Knowledge Acquisition Based on the Structure of Personal Construct Systems," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 78-88, March 1991, doi:10.1109/69.75891
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.