The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan.-March (2012 vol.5)
pp: 39-47
Sarangi P. Parikh , United States Naval Academy, Annapolis
Joel M. Esposito , United States Naval Academy, Annapolis
ABSTRACT
Touchscreen technology has become pervasive in the consumer product arena over the last decade, offering some distinct advantages such as software reconfigurable interfaces and the removal of space consuming mice and keyboards. However, there are significant drawbacks to these devices that have limited their adoption by some users. Most notably, standard touchscreens demand the user's visual attention and require them to look at the input device to avoid pressing the wrong button. This issue is particularly important for mobile, capacitive sensing, nonstylus devices, such as the iPhone where small button sizes can generate high error rates. While previous work has shown the benefits of augmenting such interfaces with audio or vibrotactile feedback, only positive feedback (confirmation of button presses) has been considered. In this paper, we present a simple prototype interface that provides negative vibrotactile feedback. By negative, we mean feedback is generated when an inactive or ambiguous part of the screen, such as the area between two buttons, is touched. First, we present a usability study comparing positive and negative vibrotactile feedback for a benchmark numerical data entry task. The difference in performance is not statistically significant, implying negative feedback provides comparable benefits. Next, based on the experimenter's observations and the users comments, we introduce a multimodal feedback strategy—combining complementary positive audio and negative vibrotactile signals. User tests on a text entry experiment show that, with multimodal feedback, users exhibit a (statistically significant) 24 percent reduction in corrective key presses, as compared to positive audio feedback alone. Exit survey comments indicate that users favor multimodal feedback.
INDEX TERMS
Auditory feedback, evaluation/methodology, input devices and strategies, user interfaces.
CITATION
Sarangi P. Parikh, Joel M. Esposito, "Negative Feedback for Small Capacitive Touchscreen Interfaces: A Usability Study for Data Entry Tasks", IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol.5, no. 1, pp. 39-47, Jan.-March 2012, doi:10.1109/TOH.2011.71
REFERENCES
[1] Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting, E. Cooper, ed. Springer-Verlag, 1983.
[2] R.L. Potter, L.J. Weldon, and B. Schneiderman, "Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies," Proc. ACM CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 27-32, 1988.
[3] A. Sears, D. Revis, J. Swatski, R. Crittenden, and B. Schneiderman, "Investigating Touchscreen Typing: The Effect of Keyboard Size on Typing Speed," Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-22, 1993.
[4] A. Sears and B. Schneiderman, "High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparison with a Mouse," Int'l J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 593-613, 1991.
[5] J. Barrettand and H. Krueger, "Performance Effects of Reduced Proprioceptive Feedback on Touch Typists and Casual Users in a Typing Task," Behavior and Information technology, vol. 13, pp. 373-381, 1994.
[6] J.R. Lewis, K.M. Potosnak, and R.L. Magyer, "Keys and Keyboards," Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer, and P.V. Prabhu, eds., pp. 1285-1315, Elsevier Science, 1997.
[7] L. Findlater, J.O. Wobbrock, and D. Wigdor, "Typing on Flat Glass: Examining Ten-Finger Expert Typing Patterns on Touch Surfaces," Proc. ACM CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2453-2462, 2011.
[8] J.S. Greenstein, "Pointing Devices," Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, M. Helander and T.L.P. Prabhu eds., pp. 1285-1315, Elsevier Science, 1997.
[9] J.R. Lewis, K.M. Potosnak, and R.L. Magyar, "Keys and Keyboards," Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, M. Helander and T.L.P. Prabhu, eds., pp. 1285-1315, Elsevier Science, 1997.
[10] H. Dreyfuss Assoc., The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design. Whitney Library of Design, 1993.
[11] S. Lee and S. Zhai, "The Performance of Touchscreen Soft Buttons," Proc. 27th Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), pp. 309-318, 2009.
[12] P.A. Albinsson and S. Zhai, "High Precision Touch Screen Interaction," Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105-112, 2003.
[13] http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/10gorilla-arm- multitouch /, 2012.
[14] M.L. Langford, "Poor Posture Subjects a Worker's Body to Muscle Imbalance, Nerve Compression," Occupational Health Safety, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 38-40, 1994.
[15] O. Bau, A.I. Poupyrev, and C. Harrison, "Tesla-Touch: Elector Vibration for Touch Surfaces," Proc. 23nd Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 283-292, 2010.
[16] V. Levesque, L. Oram, K. MacLean, A. Cockburn, N.D. Marchuk, J.E. Colgate, and M.A. Peshkin, "Enhancing Physicality in Touch Interaction with Programmable Friction," Proc. ACM CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2481-2490, 2011.
[17] Y. Jansen, T. Karrer, and J. Borchers, "MudPad: Tactile Feedback and Haptic Texture Overlay for Touch Surfaces," Proc. ACM Int'l Conf. Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS), pp.11-14, 2010.
[18] I. Poupyres, T. Nashida, J. Maruyama, J. Rekimoto, and Y. Yamaji, "Lumen: Interactive Visual and Shape Display for Clam Computing," Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH ET, pp. 17-25, 2004.
[19] C. Harrison and S.E. Hudson, "Providing Dynamically Changing Physical Buttons on a Visual Display," Proc. 27th Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), pp. 299-308, 2009.
[20] E. Hoggan, S.A. Brewster, and J. Johnston, "Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens," Proc. 26th Ann. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), pp. 1-10, 2008.
[21] J.C. Less, P.H. Dietz, D. Leigh, W. Yerazunis, and S.E. Hudson, "Haptic Pen: A Tactile Feedback Stylus for Touch Screens," Proc. 17th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 291-294, 2004.
[22] A noto, "Development Guide for Service Enabled by Anoto Functionality," 2002.
[23] M. Fukumoto and S. Toshiaki, "Active Click: Tactile Feedback for Touch Panels," Proc. CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2001.
[24] I. Poupyrev, M. Okabe, and S. Maruyama, "Haptic Feedback for Pen Computing: Directions and Strategies," Proc. CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2004.
[25] R. Leung, K. MacLean, M.B. Bertelsen, and M. Saubhasik, "Evaluation of Haptically Augmented Touchscreen GUI Elements Under Cognitive Load," Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), pp. 374-381, 2007.
[26] T. Pakkanen, R. Raisamo, J. Raisamo, K. Salminen, and V. Surakka, "Comparison of Three Designs for Haptic Button Edges on Touchscreens," Proc. IEEE Haptics Symp., pp. 219-225, Mar. 2010.
[27] G. James and D. Brown, "The Biological Stress Response and Lifestyle: Catecholamines and Blood Pressure," Ann. Rev. of Anthropology, vol. 26, pp. 313-335, 197.
[28] S.G. Hart and L.E. Staveland, "Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research," Human Mental Workload, pp. 139-183, Elsevier, 1988.
[29] S. Ovaitt, R. Coulston, and R. Lunsford, "When Do We Interact Multi-Modally? Cognitive Load and Multi-Modal Communication Patterns," Proc. Int'l Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), pp. 217-220, 2004.
7 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool