The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - July-September (2009 vol.2)
pp: 141-147
Annie Rydström , Luleå University of Technology, Luleå
Robert Broström , Volvo Car Corporation, Göteborg
Peter Bengtsson , Luleå University of Technology, Luleå
ABSTRACT
A driving simulator study was conducted to investigate whether interaction with an in-vehicle multifunctional interface maneuvered by a rotary control can be improved if assisting haptics is provided. Two conditions were compared in the study, one in which neutral haptics was provided through the rotary control and another in which enhanced haptics was provided. Participants drove on a curved rural road while performing tasks such as list scrolling, radio tuning, address and number entry, and sound settings adjustments. When enhanced haptics was provided, the radio tuning was faster and fewer glances to the display were required, and the sound settings adjustments were completed with a reduced duration of the glances. However, improvements are needed for the other tasks. Enhanced haptics seems to facilitate interaction with functions in which the sensations can be incorporated in an intuitive way.
INDEX TERMS
Automotive, graphical user interfaces, haptics applications, haptic I/O.
CITATION
Annie Rydström, Robert Broström, Peter Bengtsson, "Can Haptics Facilitate Interaction with an In-Vehicle Multifunctional Interface?", IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol.2, no. 3, pp. 141-147, July-September 2009, doi:10.1109/TOH.2009.21
REFERENCES
[1] G.E. Burnett and J.M. Porter, “Ubiquitous Computing within Cars: Designing Controls for Non-Visual Use,” Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 521-531, Oct. 2001.
[2] P. Bengtsson, C. Grane, and J. Isaksson, “Haptic/Graphic Interface for In-Vehicle Comfort Functions—A Simulator Study and an Experimental Study,” Proc. Int'l Workshop Haptic, Audio, and Visual Environments and Their Applications (HAVE), pp. 25-29, 2003.
[3] R. Vilimek, T. Hempel, and B. Otto, “Multimodal Interfaces for In-Vehicle Applications,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4552, pp. 216-224, Springer, Aug. 2007.
[4] K. Prynne, “Tactile Controls,” Automotive Interiors Int'l, pp. 30-36, 1995.
[5] J.M. Porter, S.J. Summerskill, G.E. Burnett, and K. Prynne, “BIONIC— ‘Eyes-Free’ Design of Secondary Driving Controls,” Proc. Accessible Design in the Digital World Conf., 2005.
[6] G.E. Burnett, “Designing and Evaluating In-Car User-Interfaces,” User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, J. Lumsden, ed., pp.218-236, Information Science Reference, 2008.
[7] J. Körner, “Searching in Lists While Driving—Identification of Factors Contributing to Driver Workload,” PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2006.
[8] T. Svenberg, “Interaction Concepts in a Rotary Haptic Device for Browsing through Lists in an Integrated Infotainment System,” MSc thesis, Luleå Univ. of Tech nology, 2006.
[9] S.S. Snibbe, K.E. MacLean, R. Shaw, J. Roderick, W.L. Verplank, and M. Scheeff, “Haptic Techniques for Media Control,” Proc. 14th Ann. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology, 2001.
[10] I.S. MacKenzie and R.W. Soukoreff, “Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods, Theory and Practice,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 17, nos. 2/3, pp. 147-198, Sept. 2002.
[11] C. Swindells, K.E. MacLean, K.S. Booth, and M.J. Meitner, “Exploring Affective Design for Physical Controls,” Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 933-942, 2007.
[12] “Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Usability Methods Supporting Human-Centered Design,” ISO/TR 16982:2002, 2002.
[13] L. Tijerina, E. Parmer, and M.J. Goodman, “Driver Workload Assessment of Route Guidance System Destination Entry While Driving: A Test Track Study,” Proc. Fifth ITS World Congress, 1998.
[14] T.W. Victor, J.L. Harbluk, and J. Engström, “Sensitivity of Eye-Movement Measures to In-Vehicle Task Difficulty,” Transportation Research, F, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 167-190, Mar. 2005.
[15] J. Engström, E. Johansson, and J. Östlund, “Effects of Visual and Cognitive Load in Real and Simulated Motorway Driving,” Transportation Research, F, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97-120, Mar. 2005.
[16] Å. Forsman and L. Nilsson, “Effects of Cognitive and Visual Load in Real and Simulated Driving,” Technical Report 533A, Swedish Nat'l Road and Transport Research Inst., May 2006.
[17] G. Jahn, A. Oehme, J.F. Krems, and C. Gelau, “Peripheral Detection as a Workload Measure in Driving: Effects of Traffic Complexity and Route Guidance System Use in a Driving Study,” Transportrtation Research, F, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 255-275, May 2005.
[18] C.J.D. Patten, A. Kircher, J. Östlund, L. Nilsson, and O. Svenson, “Driver Experience and Cognitive Workload in Different Traffic Environments,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 887-894, Sept. 2006.
[19] J. Engström and S. Mårdh, “SafeTE Final Report,” Technical Report 2007:36, Swedish Nat'l Road Administration, Sept. 2007.
[20] T.W. Victor, O. Blomberg, and A. Zelinsky, “Automating Driver Visual Behavior Measurement,” to be published in Vision in Vehicles 9.
[21] A. Rydström, R. Broström, and P. Bengtsson, “A Comparison of Two Contemporary Types of In-Car Multifunctional Interfaces,” to be published.
[22] “Road Vehicles—Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems—Part 1: Definitions and Parameters,” ISO 15007-1:2002, 2002.
[23] G.R. Loftus and M.E.J. Masson, “Using Confidence Intervals in Within-Subject Designs,” Psychonomic Bull. Rev., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 476-490, July 1994.
[24] G. Keppel and T.D. Wickens, Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, pp. 418-419. Prentice Hall, 2004.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool