The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - July-September (2009 vol.2)
pp: 136-140
Antal Haans , Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn , Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
ABSTRACT
A brief touch on the upper arm increases people's altruistic behavior and willingness to comply with a request. In this paper, we investigate whether this Midas touch phenomenon would also occur under mediated conditions (i.e., touching via an arm strap equipped with electromechanical actuators). Helping behavior was more frequently endorsed in the touch, compared to the no-touch condition, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant. However, a meta-analytical comparison with published research demonstrated that the strength of the virtual Midas touch is of the same magnitude as that of the Midas touch in unmediated situations. The present experiment, thus, provides empirical evidence that touch-like qualities can be attributed to electromechanical stimulation. This is important for the field of mediated social touch of which the design rationale is based on the assumption that mediated touch by means of tactile feedback technologies is processed in ways similar to real physical contact.
INDEX TERMS
Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities, human haptics, haptic technology, psychology, human factors, evaluation/methodology, communications applications.
CITATION
Antal Haans, Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, "The Virtual Midas Touch: Helping Behavior After a Mediated Social Touch", IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol.2, no. 3, pp. 136-140, July-September 2009, doi:10.1109/TOH.2009.20
REFERENCES
[1] M. Argyle and J. Dean, “Eye Contact, Distance, and Affiliation,” Sociometry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 289-304, 1965.
[2] C. Basdogan, C. Ho, M.A. Srinivasan, and M. Slater, “An Experimental Study on the Role of Touch in Shared Virtual Environments,” ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 443-460, 2000.
[3] L. Bonanni, C. Vaucelle, J. Lieberman, and O. Zuckerman, “TapTap: A Haptic Wearable for Asynchronous Distributed Touch Therapy,” Extended Abstracts of CHI 2006, pp. 580-585, ACM Press, 2006.
[4] M. Botvinick and J. Cohen, “Rubber Hands ‘Feel’ Touch That Eyes See,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6669, p. 756, 1998.
[5] S. Brave and A. Dahley, “InTouch: A Medium for Haptic Interpersonal Communication,” Extended Abstracts of CHI 1997, S. Pemberton, ed., pp.363-364, ACM Press, 1997.
[6] S. Brave, C. Nass, and E. Sirinian, “Force-Feedback in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Universal Access in HCI: Towards an Information Soc. for All, C. Stephanidis, ed., vol. 3, pp. 145-149, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
[7] G.C. Burdea, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. John Wiley, 1996.
[8] A.H. Crusco and C.G. Wetzel, “The Midas Touch: The Effects of Interpersonal Touch on Restaurant Tipping,” Personality Social Psychology Bull., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 512-517, 1984.
[9] V.J. Derlega, R.J. Lewis, S. Harrison, B.A. Winstead, and R. Costanza, “Gender Differences in the Initiation and Attribution of Tactile Intimacy,” J.Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 83-96, 1989.
[10] J.D. Fisher, M. Rytting, and R. Heslin, “Hands Touching Hands: Affective and Evaluative Effects of an Interpersonal Touch,” Sociometry, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 416-421, 1976.
[11] K. Floyd, “Affectionate Same-Sex Touch: The Influence of Homophobia on Observers' Perceptions,” J. Social Psychology, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 774-788, 2000.
[12] A. Gallace and C. Spence, “The Science of Interpersonal Touch: An Overview,” to be published in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Rev.
[13] M. Goldman and J. Fordyce, “Prosocial Behavior as Affected by Eye Contact, Touch, and Voice Expression,” J. Social Psychology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 125-129, 1983.
[14] M. Goldman, O. Kiyohara, and D.A. Pfannensteil, “Interpersonal Touch, Social Labeling, and the Foot-in-the-Door Effect,” J. Social Psychology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 143-147, 1985.
[15] N. Guéguen, “Status, Apparel and Touch: Their Joint Effects on Compliance to a Request,” North Am. J. Psychology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 279-286, 2002.
[16] N. Guéguen, “Touch, Awareness of Touch, and Compliance with a Request,” Perceptual Motor Skills, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 355-360, 2002.
[17] N. Guéguen and J. Fisher-Lokou, “An Evaluation of Touch on a Large Request: A Field Setting,” Psychological Reports, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 267-269, 2002.
[18] N. Guéguen and J. Fisher-Lokou, “Another Evaluation of Touch and Helping Behavior,” Psychological Reports, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 62-64, 2003.
[19] N. Guéguen and J. Fisher-Lokou, “Tactile Contact and Spontaneous Help: An Evaluation in a Natural Setting,” J. Social Psychology, vol. 143, no. 6, pp.785-787, 2003.
[20] A. Haans and W.A. IJsselsteijn, “Mediated Social Touch: A Review of Current Research and Future Directions,” Virtual Reality, vol. 9, nos. 2/3, pp. 149-159, 2006.
[21] A. Haans, C. de Nood, and W.A. IJsselsteijn, “Investigating Response Similarities Between Real and Mediated Social Touch: A First Test,” Extended Abstracts of CHI 2007, B. Begole, S. Payne, E. Churchill, R.S. Amant, D. Golmore, and M.B. Rosson, eds., pp. 2405-1410, ACM Press, 2007.
[22] V. Hayward and K.E. MacLean, “Do it Yourself Haptics: Part I,” IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 88-104, Dec. 2007.
[23] W.A. IJsselsteijn, Y.A.W. de Kort, and A. Haans, “Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 15, no. 4, pp.455-464, 2006.
[24] C.L. Kleinke, “Compliance to Requests Made by Gazing and Touching Experimenters in Field Settings,” J. Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 218-223, 1977.
[25] R.J. Lewis, V.J. Derlega, A. Shankar, E. Cochard, and L. Finkel, “NonVerbal Correlates of Confederates' Touch: Confounds in Touch Research,” J. Social Behavior Personality, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 821-830, 1997.
[26] B. Mayor, A.M. Schmidlin, and L. Williams, “Gender Patterns in Social Touch: The Impact of Setting and Age,” J. Personality Social Psychology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 634-643, 1990.
[27] F. Mueller, F. Vetere, M.R. Gibbs, J. Kjeldskov, S. Pedell, and S. Howard, “Hug over a Distance,” Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005, pp. 1673-1676, ACM Press, 2005.
[28] R.G. Newcombe, “Interval Estimation for the Difference Between Independent Proportions: Comparison of Eleven Methods,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 873-890, 1998.
[29] M.L. Patterson, J.L. Powell, and M.G. Lenihan, “Touch, Compliance, and Interpersonal Affect,” J. Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 41-50, 1986.
[30] S. Paulsell and M. Goldman, “The Effect of Touching Different Body Areas on Prosocial Behavior,” J. Social Psychology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 269-273, 1984.
[31] J.L. Powell, W. Meil, M.L. Patterson, E.F. Chouinard, B. Collins, T.J. Kobus, W. Habermeier, and W.L. Arnone, “Effects of Timing of Touch on Compliance to a Request,” J. Social Behavior Personality, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.153-162, 1994.
[32] A.F. Rovers and H.A. van Essen, “FootIO: Design and Evaluation of a Device to Enable Foot Interaction over a Computer Network,” Proc. Worldhaptics 2005, pp. 521-222, 2005.
[33] A.F. Rovers and H.A. van Essen, “Guidelines for Haptic Interpersonal Communication Applications: An Exploration of Foot Interaction Styles,” Virtual Reality, vol. 9, nos. 2/3, pp. 177-191, 2006.
[34] J. Sánchez-Meca and F. Marín-Martínez, “Meta-Analysis of 2 × 2 Tables: Estimating a Common Risk Difference,” Educational Psychological Measurement, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 249-276, 2001.
17 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool